Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Chilcot Report uses OGL

On 10 July 2016 at 09:26, とある白い猫 wrote: > BBC and commercial providers can be compelled on the basis of public > interest Can you provide a citation or case study to substantiate that claim? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Chilcot Report uses OGL

On 10/07/16 09:26, とある白い猫 wrote: > > BBC and commercial providers can be compelled on the basis of public > interest since the recordings are briefings of the people compiling the > reports. Not my experience. The BBC has very complex rights issues. Gordo

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wikimania-l] "Friendly and inclusive", and Brexit at Wikimania

Dear Deryck, I'm terribly sorry that the recent events made your (and also my) experience of wikimania left a slightly bitter taste. Even we had our differences, I think we should strive to make the conference inclusive, otherwise if one sort of correctness takes hold it's rather unhelpful

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Chilcot Report uses OGL

The thing is I would rather not go through each attachment one by one if possible since this creates an unneeded complexity. An overarching copyright statement would achieve to circumvent this. I cannot find a single reason why we should not seek this. Also "unless otherwise stated" is a very

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] "Friendly and inclusive", and Brexit at Wikimania

Hi Deryk Thank you for sharing such a personal response to your experiences at Wikimania, and you raise a very valid point about different cultural sensitivities and the possibility of feeling like an outsider IRL as well as online. I'm so sorry you felt rejected and excluded at Wikimania. I