Sorry, Harry. I have the book version printed in 2003 and the case in which you
are interested was not decided until 2008. I could not access a more recent
print until the library re-opens. Back to the other mailing list members…
Anthony/AGK
t; of what I need from Google Books but it wouldn't hurt to see if it has
> anything else of use. I just don't want to spend £30 on a second-hand copy
> for just a few pages.
I have it. Messaged you off-list.
Anthony/AGK
___
Wikimedi
Hi John
If there is an existing instance of MediaWiki, I would be happy to volunteer a
few hours to install the extensions you are missing, update to the latest
version, and make any other changes I think are within my abilities.
I’m not a professional techie but I’ve installed MediaWiki on sev
involved in developing a Wikimania bid? (I don't
follow WM governance very closely, and may misunderstand that aspect
of the Chapter's purpose.)
--
Anthony (AGK)
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/m
ut so far as paid employees of WMUK are concerned I would hope they
are above such rivalry.
--
Anthony (AGK)
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Precisely, and there is extensive precedent (including in court decisions
relating to allegedly inaccurate headlines) for article titles to be
generalising if the reality is explained in the body. If we wrote to them,
there probably wouldn't be a correction.
--
Anthony (AGK)
Sent fr
On 26 February 2012 20:28, Gordon Joly wrote:
> Any interest for Wikimedians?
>
> Gordo
It's difficult to pass up an opportunity such as this, and I wonder
why there was no interest from the other bodies. What is the cost:
shipping only, or are they trying to make a sale?
-
To be clear, by "security" I presume the meaning was the identity of
Wikimedians. By attending these events, Damian can see and photograph
pseudonymous individuals. Not, really, that the specific wording matters one
jot.
A.
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Jan 2012, at 23:34, pet...@cix.compulink.co.
Peter,
The additional issues with Buckner, who routinely tries to uncover the identity
of Wikipedians who are in high-profile roles, mean it is quite appropriate to
ban him from these events.
Nobody said he was a "security risk", but it is the case that he has caused
stress among many editors
sume separately from Lord
Lester's efforts), so this is far from a lost cause—and with the
ferocity of the libelreform.org campaign, I can't see it ever becoming
so.
Today is certainly a good time to be part of the free culture movement.
AGK
__
Shame about the date. I'm in London from the 10th, and doubt I can
move the start date forward at this late stage. Wish I'd have known
about this meet-up sooner!
AGK
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wik
Andrew: I don't see any reference to WMUK in that article. Did you meant to
say it referred to another germane topic, or am I simply being dense?
AGK
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/lis
>
> Another goalpost is moving...
Moving in a direction that I would say is of benefit to Wikimedia and its
users.
AGK
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK
13 matches
Mail list logo
