Stevie will - am away from my PC
On 8 July 2012 11:35, Richard Farmbrough wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Can you send me an application form.
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Richard.
>
>
> __**_
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikim
Hi Jon,
Can you send me an application form.
All the best,
Richard.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
>
>
> As a point of interest; what *exactly* does need to be done for the
> fundraiser? I've seen no actual specification; and what I was suggesting
> when we last had these discussions is that we outline more specifically the
> needs in this
On 25 June 2012 20:10, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 25 June 2012 19:48, Charles Matthews
> wrote:
> > OK, I have an answer of sorts. To me fixing the SSL looks urgent. So one
> > could say that paying the going commercial rate to have it fixed, by
> someone
> > who knows what he or she is doing, is
On 25 June 2012 19:48, Charles Matthews wrote:
> OK, I have an answer of sorts. To me fixing the SSL looks urgent. So one
> could say that paying the going commercial rate to have it fixed, by someone
> who knows what he or she is doing, is a good idea. Then the hiring of a
> technical person (I t
SSL *is* fixed, or at least the issue has been worked around. The issue here is
the long-term maintenance of SSL, to ensure that it continues to work and can
be quickly fixed if it breaks, and can be extended as needed - particularly
during the critical fundraising period. Having a staff member
On 25 June 2012 19:39, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 25 June 2012 19:31, Charles Matthews
> wrote:
> > Could you answer the question? You are making an assertion which rather
> begs
> > the question why a community member hasn't done exactly that.
>
> No, I can't answer the question because it is ba
SSL might be a bad example. It's only a couple of hours work to fix; I
offered to do it once.
Tom Morton
On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:18, Charles Matthews
wrote:
On 25 June 2012 18:49, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> It may surprise you to hear that Mike was the one arguing for contractors,
> so this cer
On 25 June 2012 19:31, Charles Matthews wrote:
> Could you answer the question? You are making an assertion which rather begs
> the question why a community member hasn't done exactly that.
No, I can't answer the question because it is based on a false
premise. As you know, you can prove anything
On 25 June 2012 19:23, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 25 June 2012 19:18, Charles Matthews
> wrote:
> > Is Mike's view that having a contractor in to fix the SSL problem would
> cost
> > too much generally shared? The SSL does impact on the credibility of the
> > fundraiser, which raised £1M last tim
On 25 June 2012 19:18, Charles Matthews wrote:
> Is Mike's view that having a contractor in to fix the SSL problem would cost
> too much generally shared? The SSL does impact on the credibility of the
> fundraiser, which raised £1M last time and one would hope that number would
> go up in future.
On 25 June 2012 18:49, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> It may surprise you to hear that Mike was the one arguing for contractors,
> so this certainly isn't a matter of refusing to budge from your first
> decision.
>
Is Mike's view that having a contractor in to fix the SSL problem would
cost too much g
On Jun 25, 2012 3:40 PM, "Charles Matthews"
wrote:
>
> On 25 June 2012 14:44, Jon Davies wrote:
>>
>> I am pleased to announce that we are recruiting for a Developer.
>>
> Disappointed that a community view expressed here has been brushed
aside. The Board members who participated in the discussio
On 25 June 2012 16:10, Thomas Morton wrote:
>
> As a point of interest; what *exactly* does need to be done for the
> fundraiser? I've seen no actual specification; and what I was suggesting
> when we last had these discussions is that we outline more specifically the
> needs in this area.
>
>
>
On 25 June 2012 15:54, Jon Davies wrote:
> A matter of timescales - getting really close to the fundraiser and other
> things.
> Lots of opinions from different people and yet a decision had to be made.
> Not an easy decision to make and those making it have shown leaderships I
> think. You can't
On 25 June 2012 15:54, Jon Davies wrote:
> A matter of timescales - getting really close to the fundraiser and other
> things.
> Lots of opinions from different people and yet a decision had to be made.
> Not an easy decision to make and those making it have shown leaderships I
> think. You can't
A matter of timescales - getting really close to the fundraiser and other
things.
Lots of opinions from different people and yet a decision had to be made.
Not an easy decision to make and those making it have shown leaderships I
think. You can't please all the people all of the time and this discu
On 25 June 2012 14:44, Jon Davies wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that we are recruiting for a Developer.
>
> Disappointed that a community view expressed here has been brushed
aside. The Board members who participated in the discussion on this list
did not convince me, at least, that the ideas
I am pleased to announce that we are recruiting for a Developer.
Details are available on the UK wiki.
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_job_description#About_Wikimedia_UK
Please email me for an application form.
Jon Davies
P.S. Please feel free to share this with sympathetic organisation
19 matches
Mail list logo
