On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 08:54, Gordon Joly wrote:
> Also - "Wikimedia Commons" vs "Archives for All" - where should you
> lodge copies of your data?
Both, and more. Archiving today is a distribution problem, not a trust problem.
Make it copyleft/PD, make it easily moveable, let people repl
Agree
On Monday, 2 April 2012, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 12:28, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>>
>> On a broader note I would suggest that the UK prioritise longterm
funding streams - payroll giving, and annual direct debits which may have a
lower attrition rate than monthly direct debits. Lo
On 01/04/2012 12:28, WereSpielChequers wrote:
On a broader note I would suggest that the UK prioritise longterm
funding streams - payroll giving, and annual direct debits which may
have a lower attrition rate than monthly direct debits. Longer term we
should think about legacies. One of the f
On 1 April 2012 12:28, WereSpielChequers wrote:
I wouldn't worry about possible further centralisation after 2016, by then
> the pendulum will have swung and centralisation will be out of favour. The
> movement is by its nature global and decentralised, you can't work against
> the grain for lon
There's a bit more context from the Foundation Board Q&A at the Chapters
meeting, here:
http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/wmcon12-day2-board-chapters
I am very pleased that we now have this issue settled. The argument that we
collectively made to the Foundation was that we would be able to raise more
Good to see the UK and three other chapters can still fundraise via the
annual fundraiser. Bad to see that they are still following their
centralisation agenda and limiting it to just those four chapters for the
next three years. I'm curious about the motion on dissemination, I think
this may be di
On 31 March 2012 22:17, David Gerard wrote:
> On 31 March 2012 21:53, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
>> Now, what happens in the 2016-17 fundraiser is anybody's guess. The
>> WMF board is intending to re-evaluate the whole thing. My hope is that
>> the 4 fundraising chapters will have demonstrated what a
On 31 March 2012 21:53, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Now, what happens in the 2016-17 fundraiser is anybody's guess. The
> WMF board is intending to re-evaluate the whole thing. My hope is that
> the 4 fundraising chapters will have demonstrated what a success
> chapters fundraising can be and other ch
: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:53:49
To: HJ Mitchell;
Reply-To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Board Resolutions from
March 30th 2012
On 31 March 2012 21:26, HJ Mitchell wrote:
> Could somebody concisely expl
On 31 March 2012 21:26, HJ Mitchell wrote:
> Could somebody concisely explain what this certainly means for WMUK, and
> what it might mean in the worst- and best-case scenarios? I understand the
> issues, and I'm sure the nuances are still being worked out, but I can't be
> the only person wonderi
ng.
Harry
From: Chris Keating
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Friday, 30 March 2012, 22:50
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Board Resolutions from March 30th
2012
Those of you not on Foundation-l might be interested to see this post from
Ting, the chair of the Founda
Those of you not on Foundation-l might be interested to see this post from
Ting, the chair of the Foundation board, which has some important
implications for the development of Wikimedia UK in future.
Regards,
Chris
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ting Chen
Date: Fri, Mar 30, 2012
12 matches
Mail list logo
