We can assume you decision was arrived at in good faith without agreeing
with it.
Keeping the report secret while a secret comittee reviews it and prepares a
response is, I believe, the wrong decision.
I hope you will publish the report now so that the response can take
account of comments by the
I would suggest that real-world discussions like this do not benefit *at
all* from quoting *editing* principles like "Assume Good Faith".
It's weird and cultish. Besides, it is irrelevant. Good faith has nothing
to do with accuracy of judgment, or objective morality.
Andreas
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013
On 6 February 2013 13:11, wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I think it is more a matter of what standards "we" (as the membership)
> should expect from a) the board and b) WMUK the firm (which is undoubtedly
> what it is).
>
> I value you your contributions because you are always pushing "us" (the
> membershi
Hi Tom,
I think it is more a matter of what standards "we" (as the membership)
should expect from a) the board and b) WMUK the firm (which is undoubtedly
what it is).
I value you your contributions because you are always pushing "us" (the
membership, the board and the staff, i.e. the firm as a wh
