[Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Jon Davies
(Certainly something we should consider f they do it again JD) We were blown away by the thoughtfulness and innovation in the hundreds of fantastic submissions we received. We unfortunately had to make some tough decisions in narrowing down

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Andy Mabbett
I hadn't heard that we were applying, but I've made a successful application in the past, so happy to assist with future bids. On May 23, 2013 8:54 AM, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: (Certainly something we should consider f they do it again JD)

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Jon Davies
We didn't apply this time but thanks for the offer. We probably need to be more nimble next time. On 23 May 2013 10:23, Andy Mabbett pigsotw...@gmail.com wrote: I hadn't heard that we were applying, but I've made a successful application in the past, so happy to assist with future bids. On

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread fabian
Hi all, I think we need a different approach if we are to put in bids for substantial amounts of money. It is probably best not to simply follow funders objectives, but rather to focus on a goal around which we have already gained consensus, something which would make a real difference and then

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Charles Matthews
On 23 May 2013 11:19, fab...@unpopular.org.uk wrote: I would suggest that if people are serious about going for a substantial slice of funding, then they work up the idea and then see if the concensus of the community is ready to back them. At that stage, it will then be a matter of finding

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Andy Mabbett
Google grants isn't money, it's free, targeted advertising on Google results pages. We can use that in line with our existing aims and objectives, whether we push fund-raising, events, or just general awareness. On May 23, 2013 12:19 PM, fab...@unpopular.org.uk wrote: Hi all, I think we need a

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Stevie Benton
Just to clear up any confusion, the main point of interest I think is the Global Impact Challenge, which was tentatively discussed on the UK wiki herehttp://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Google_Global_Impact_Challenge . Unfortunately the shortness of the timescale was somewhat prohibitive for Wikimedia

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Jon Davies
Google have a grants system (go back to the start of the string) Of course we could try and get more page hits ...:) On 23 May 2013 14:48, Andy Mabbett pigsotw...@gmail.com wrote: Google grants isn't money, it's free, targeted advertising on Google results pages. We can use that in line with

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Charles Matthews
On 23 May 2013 14:53, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: Google have a grants system (go back to the start of the string) Of course we could try and get more page hits ...:) Yes, some cross-purposes here. https://globalimpactchallenge.withgoogle.com/ and

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] If you are interested in the google grants results.

2013-05-23 Thread Katherine Bavage
Staff capacity is /an/ issue. With the benefits of collaboration on wiki in drafting applications, bid writing needn't be staff led but staff supported (you guys write the pitch, I support it with numbers/details where possible). The challenge is that good funding bids do require quite a lot of