On 01/05/12 00:01, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 30 April 2012 23:52, Roger Bamkinvictuall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Thomas, the legal position is far from clear. I'm hoping to get a steer
on current custom and practice. I see that lots of wifi's have tick boxes
for Tc's why?
Am I happy
I recall a friend (who knows stuff) ran an open wifi network at home, in
a house that stood in a field in the countryside. I said, what is your
security? He replied: my dog - it barks if anybody gets close enough to
see the wifi signal.
Case closed, m'lud?
Gordo
On 30 April 2012 22:56, Roger Bamkin roger.bam...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm interested in wifis. We have some concerns about the legalities of
allowing anonymous users to use a free wifi system without giving their
email addresses or agreeing to terms and conditions. Can't tell you
On 1 May 2012 10:06, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2012 22:56, Roger Bamkin roger.bam...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm interested in wifis. We have some concerns about the legalities of
allowing anonymous users to use a free wifi system without giving their
email
On 1 May 2012 10:35, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
More than anything it depends on the context; if you are talking about a
small endeavour at, say, a meeting venue you're probably alright using an
ad-hoc setup. But if you are talking an entirely public network then things
On 1 May 2012 11:04, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 May 2012 10:35, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
More than anything it depends on the context; if you are talking about a
small endeavour at, say, a meeting venue you're probably alright using an
ad-hoc setup.
On 1 May 2012 11:24, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
On 1 May 2012 11:04, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I note also the Hack Day Manifesto (really a how-to), which goes into
quite some detail on the technical side (though not the legal one):
http://hackdaymanifesto.com/
As one
, but news ceases to be news.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] So who knows about their local wifi?
From: Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org
Date: Tue, May 01, 2012 11:24 am
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 1 May 2012 11:04, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
to be news.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] So who knows about their local wifi?
From: Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org
Date: Tue, May 01, 2012 11:24 am
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 1 May 2012 11:04, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 May
Hi guys,
I'm interested in wifis. We have some concerns about the legalities of
allowing anonymous users to use a free wifi system without giving their
email addresses or agreeing to terms and conditions. Can't tell you where -
but you might guess
Does anyone...
- Know what the legal
Are you really going to use wikimediauk-l as your legal advisors?
You're going to have to get professional legal advice anyway, so why
ask us first?
On 30 April 2012 22:56, Roger Bamkin roger.bam...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm interested in wifis. We have some concerns about the
Hi Thomas, the legal position is far from clear. I'm hoping to get a steer
on current custom and practice. I see that lots of wifi's have tick boxes
for Tc's why?
Am I happy to take legal advise from WMUK? Thats not what I asked.
I'm quite happy to see if they can point me at a relevant law
On 30 April 2012 23:52, Roger Bamkin victuall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Thomas, the legal position is far from clear. I'm hoping to get a steer
on current custom and practice. I see that lots of wifi's have tick boxes
for Tc's why?
Am I happy to take legal advise from WMUK? Thats not what I
On 1 May 2012, at 00:01, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 30 April 2012 23:52, Roger Bamkin victuall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Thomas, the legal position is far from clear. I'm hoping to get a steer
on current custom and practice. I see that lots of wifi's have tick boxes
for Tc's why?
Am I
14 matches
Mail list logo
