Thanks for that explanation. Could you provide a link to the review meetings that were held in advance of designing the survey?
If this was a model for the WIR review, then I presume that as a Lead Trainer I was invited to contribute to that stage, not just the general satisfaction survey that is completed by both unpaid volunteers and paid volunteers. Fae On 7 April 2014 11:15, Richard Nevell <richard.nev...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > Regarding the Training the Trainers review, people who went on the course > were invited to complete a survey. In fact you were sent multiple emails > about it. 27 out of the 34 people invited to the survey replied. > > > On 7 April 2014 11:06, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for your answers on this Jon. Nice to see you engaging with >> volunteers. >> >> I seem to be left to answer my own question. I have to assume an >> on-wiki page does not exist. The charity and the board of trustees is >> 100% committed to transparency and staying volunteer-centric. To >> demonstrate that is still the case today, I see no reason why the >> minutes of this important weekend meeting should not now be promptly >> published on-wiki. >> >> I am taken aback that there was a review of Train the Trainers. As an >> unpaid volunteer Lead Trainer I would expect to be informed or invited >> to contribute. Why do we know nothing about it? >> >> Thanks for confirming this meeting existed with the members of the >> charity Jon, I am sure you have no interest in keeping the details of >> who went and why they were chosen an unnecessary secret. This is the >> sort of leadership on transparency that our CEO needs at his core, >> preferably to avoid these questions ever occuring. >> >> Fae. >> >> On 7 April 2014 11:00, Jon Davies <jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: >> > Internal is the sense that it was staff and people who had been/are >> > employed >> > as WiR plus one other person who had been heavily involved in the >> > employment >> > and a trustee. >> > >> > When we reviewed Train the Trainers we followed a similar model of small >> > groups, individual interviews etc. >> > >> > This was part of the process. >> > >> > The weekend as this was the only day that worked for the group as a >> > whole. >> > >> > I hope that explains it and that we will encourage Andy and everyone to >> > continue to participate in this review. >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > >> > On 7 April 2014 10:50, Michael Peel <michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Jon, >> >> >> >> I'm confused - how can it be a 'small internal meeting' that also >> >> includes >> >> people that aren't 'internal' to the WMUK office? And why, if it's an >> >> internal meeting, did it take place on a weekend necessitating staff to >> >> give >> >> up their Saturday? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> On 7 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Jon Davies <jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Good morning everybody, >> >> > >> >> > Daria and I are puzzled as to why a small internal meeting gained the >> >> > status of a 'summit'! It was part of the analysis we are doing >> >> > particularly with regard to the UK sponsored WiR posts and one of a >> >> > series >> >> > of processes. It involved people who had been paid by WMUK or closely >> >> > involved in that proocess looking at the particular issues that >> >> > brings up. >> >> > >> >> > We fully expect Andy and everyone to be involved through the >> >> > consultation and in particular we are planning a day event (it was >> >> > provisionally May 24 but we are not sure of the date yet, it is >> >> > likely to >> >> > slip into June). This will be up on the wiki as soon as we know and >> >> > everyone will be welcome. Andy's experience will be very relevant. >> >> > >> >> > Jon >> >> > >> >> > PS Can I thank Jonathan and Daria and everyone else who gave up their >> >> > Saturday. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 7 April 2014 03:02, Chris McKenna <cmcke...@sucs.org> wrote: >> >> > What information have you found about this event? I have been unable >> >> > to >> >> > verify its existence based on searches of google, WMF wikis and >> >> > mailing >> >> > lists to which I am subscribed. >> >> > >> >> > The closest I can come is Daria posting on the 17th March on the WMF >> >> > Outreach Wiki about WMUK's survey about WIR positions in the UK [1], >> >> > or her >> >> > posting on the Water Cooler on Thursday (3 April) about the volunteer >> >> > opportunity related to analysing the data from this survey [2]. >> >> > >> >> > This makes me wonder whether some wires have got crossed somewhere >> >> > along >> >> > the line? >> >> > >> >> > Chris >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > [1] >> >> > >> >> > https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikipedian_in_Residence#Wikimedia_UK_is_running_a_survey_of_its_WIR_programme >> >> > [2] >> >> > >> >> > https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Water_cooler#Looking_for_a_Research_Volunteer_to_help_us_with_the_Wikimedian_in_Residence_survey_-_interesting_opportunity.21 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> >> > >> >> > As a four-time[1] Wikipedian-in-Residence (indeed, as WMUK's first >> >> > Wikipedian-in-Residence), I would be interested to know more about >> >> > the >> >> > "Wikipedian-in-Residence summit", which was apparently held by WMUK >> >> > yesterday. >> >> > >> >> > I don't seem to be able to find anything on the wiki, not even an >> >> > event >> >> > listing. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > [1] More , if you count short stints under other titles. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Andy Mabbett >> >> > @pigsonthewing >> >> > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> >> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> >> > >> >> > ---- >> >> > Chris McKenna >> >> > >> >> > cmcke...@sucs.org >> >> > www.sucs.org/~cmckenna >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The essential things in life are seen not with the eyes, >> >> > but with the heart >> >> > >> >> > Antoine de Saint Exupery >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> >> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 >> >> > 169 >> >> > tweet @jonatreesdavies >> >> > >> >> > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England >> >> > and >> >> > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. >> >> > Registered >> >> > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London >> >> > EC2A 4LT. >> >> > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia >> >> > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation >> >> > (who >> >> > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). >> >> > Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990(0044) 207 065 0990. >> >> > >> >> > Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> >> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> >> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 >> > 169(0044) 7803 505 169 >> > tweet @jonatreesdavies >> > >> > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and >> > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered >> > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A >> > 4LT. >> > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia >> > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation >> > (who >> > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). >> > >> > Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990(0044) 207 065 0990. >> > >> > Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> >> >> >> -- >> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae >> Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk > > > > > -- > Richard Nevell > Assistant Office Manager > Wikimedia UK > +44 (0) 20 7065 0753+44 (0) 20 7065 0753 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote. Call Send SMS Add to Skype You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
