Well, that is a small group and a much bigger group. The small group
might just fit into the office, but the bigger one would not!
:-)
Gordon
On 08/05/12 12:50, Richard Symonds wrote:
The UK community - both members and non-members :-)
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Disclaim
On 8 May 2012 10:40, Jon Davies wrote:
> I am pretty certain that nobody doubts how hard we work in the office but
> part of our job will be to make sure people understand what we are doing and
> delivering.
Indeed, I haven't heard anyone doubt that you are working hard. The
question is just rega
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 8 May 2012 12:50, Richard Symonds
> wrote:
> > The UK community - both members and non-members :-)
>
> Getting to know the international community wouldn't hurt either - I
> know Jon has visited both Berlin and San Fransisco in order to g
On 8 May 2012 12:50, Richard Symonds wrote:
> The UK community - both members and non-members :-)
Getting to know the international community wouldn't hurt either - I
know Jon has visited both Berlin and San Fransisco in order to get to
know people. Hopefully those trips will just be the start of
The UK community - both members and non-members :-)
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Disclaimer viewable at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Email_disclaimer
Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
On 8 May 2012 12:42, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 08/05/12 12:40, Chris
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 08/05/12 12:40, Chris Keating wrote:
>
>>
>> It's important staff get to know the community, this is often
>> accomplished better by a friendly chat than an unfriendly interrogation. ;-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
> Which community?
IDK, which one di
On 08/05/12 12:40, Chris Keating wrote:
It's important staff get to know the community, this is often
accomplished better by a friendly chat than an unfriendly
interrogation. ;-)
Chris
Which community?
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikim
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 06/05/12 23:15, Fae wrote:
>
>> (for example, it says that Edward Buckner came in for a friendly chat
>> last week with generally positive results, but I hope you realize that I
>> would not tell you all that on a public list unless Edward
On 06/05/12 23:15, Fae wrote:
(for example, it says that Edward Buckner came in for a friendly chat
last week with generally positive results, but I hope you realize that
I would not tell you all that on a public list unless Edward had
written about the experience himself in another public plac
On 8 May 2012 10:40, Jon Davies wrote:
> I am pretty certain that nobody doubts how hard we work in the office but
> part of our job will be to make sure people understand what we are doing and
> delivering.
I'll chip in with the comment that I think Board members have
consistently (in my experie
I am pretty certain that nobody doubts how hard we work in the office but
part of our job will be to make sure people understand what we are doing
and delivering.
As Fae says there is a weekly report to the board which covers the twenty
or thirty key events of the week. To be useful this contains
On 6 May 2012 23:15, Fae wrote:
> As a trustee with a duty to monitor rather than direct, I'm interested in
> necessary, accurate and easy to consume reporting.
> [snip]
> It is important that any reporting does not become a massive burden compared
> to its value
Hopefully, we can find a way for
As a trustee with a duty to monitor rather than direct, I'm interested in
necessary, accurate and easy to consume reporting. The Board needs to know
that our investment in staff and office is well spent. Jon and I have
talked about the option of one-page dashboard style reports that might be
mainta
On 05/05/12 23:10, Thomas Dalton wrote:
By my reckoning, there is something like 160 person-hours of work
being done in the office every week. I would love to know what that
work actually is!
I was invited into the office, I spoke to staff, and I was given a mug.
That all takes time, you know!
+1
By my reckoning, there is something like 160 person-hours of work
being done in the office every week. I would love to know what that
work actually is!
On 5 May 2012 23:08, joseph seddon wrote:
> Dear Jon, Daria, Stevie and Richard
>
> Hope this doesn't sound like too much of a silly question
Dear Jon, Daria, Stevie and Richard
Hope this doesn't sound like too much of a silly question, but I would love to
know what you guys do throughout the week :) I dont just mean like on average.
But I would love to be able to see what projects staff are working on, how
projects are progressing e
16 matches
Mail list logo
