Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 177, Issue 8

2020-04-29 Thread Rex X
I do indeed recall the previous discussions, and I'm as opposed as anyone to the practice of public custodians of our heritage attempting to claim a fresh copyright for their reproductions of public domain art. Although Bridgeman v Corel is highly influential for the USA, we must be aware that

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 177, Issue 8

2020-04-29 Thread
Public domain for 2D works applies for old 2D artefacts, like manuscripts or flat decorated objects. The examples I've seen include objects like 15th C. drawings, which the claim of "copyright of the Trustees" may be safely ignored as there is no new creativity in the likely automated scans being

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 177, Issue 8

2020-04-29 Thread Rex X
I'm pretty sure CC BY-NC-SA is not compatible with the licences on Commons. They could be uploaded and used on en-wiki with a fair use rationale, the same as any other non-free image. -- Rexx > On 29 April 2020 at 13:30 John Byrne wrote: > > So can we put them on Commons? Or use them

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 177, Issue 8

2020-04-29 Thread John Byrne
So can we put them on Commons?  Or use them from a Wikipedia file? John On 29 April 2020 at 13:00 wikimediauk-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote: Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to