That did the trick. Thank you, Dan!
—
James Hare
President, Wikimedia DC
http://wikimediadc.org
@wikimediadc
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> I see the potential problem then. James, try something else for me:
>
> Instead of Rolling Active Editor, which is a
I see the potential problem then. James, try something else for me:
Instead of Rolling Active Editor, which is a heavy and scary metric, try
using Edits with:
Start: *June 1st 2014*
End: *October 1st 2014*
Time Series by: *month*
Namespaces: if you leave this blank, it will get all namespaces, w
I am Kevin (Product Manager for the Analytics team) and I am keeping an eye
on this thread and what we could do better.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Edward Galvez
wrote:
> Sorry - I meant Dan!
>
> And thanks for the clarification James (those metrics make sense)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015
Sorry - I meant Dan!
And thanks for the clarification James (those metrics make sense)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, James Hare wrote:
> (Who’s Kevin?)
>
> For Rolling Active Editor, I decided to chunk it into month-long periods.
> So I am trying the first one for 30 days prior to June 1
(Who’s Kevin?)
For Rolling Active Editor, I decided to chunk it into month-long periods. So I
am trying the first one for 30 days prior to June 1, 2014. Yet that report
nonetheless failed.
The report for newly registered worked out just fine.
—
James Hare
President, Wikimedia DC
http://wi
Hi James and Kevin,
Here are the global metrics specifications for newly registered and active
editors involved for wmf grantees. James, please let us know if you are looking
for other metrics or if these are what you need. I ask because the metrics you
are specifying sound different.
https:/
Rolling new active editor may not be the metric I need. Just, for that period
of time, I need to know which of the editors were active editors (5+
edits/month) and which had created their accounts in that period.
Thanks,
James
—
James Hare
President, Wikimedia DC
http://wikimediadc.org
@wiki
James,
I'm cc-ing Jonathan as this issue looks to have two components.
First, James, I ran the Edits metric on your cohort and it worked ok. I am
running the Rolling New Active Editor metric and it seems a bit slow, so
we're looking into that.
Second, how exactly are these reports run? Like, a
James,
If you could send the cohort you are using (if it is not private) it will
help when troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Nuria
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, James Hare wrote:
> I want to know, for a period from July 1 to September 30, which of the
> ~1,300 contributors are new, and which are ac
I want to know, for a period from July 1 to September 30, which of the ~1,300
contributors are new, and which are active editors, per the global metrics
meanings of those terms. Let me know fi you need a list of usernames from me.
Thanks,
James
—
James Hare
President, Wikimedia DC
http://wik
James,
There are probably better metrics for your purposes, could you let us know
what data are you interested on? Once we know that we can take a look to
see if there are any issues with the tool itself.
Thanks,
Nuria
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:47 PM, James Hare wrote:
> I am trying to r
11 matches
Mail list logo
