Re: [Wikisource-l] ProofreadPage Extension and Semantic Forms

I can only confirm what TPT said, sorry. But if, as it seems, you are working on transcribing a dictionary in order to import it into Wikisource, I am interested in hearing updates when you have some. Nemo ___ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@l

Re: [Wikisource-l] Is nsPage merely a proofreading tool?

On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:46:22 +0200, Alex Brollo wrote: > Into a recent talk at en.source Scriptorium, it has been told that nsPage > can be viewed merely as a proofreading tool, the ns0 transclusion/text > being the real core of source content. > > I have a different opinion, since I see nsPage c

Re: [Wikisource-l] Is nsPage merely a proofreading tool?

Thanks for illustrating clearly this point of view. Nevertheless: are we digitalizing works or are we digitalizing books? It's different. Apart from theory of difference between a work and a book, there's too some practical consequence. If nsPage is central as it is in my opinion, then any data,