Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Hi, I failed to understand how splitting Wikisource projects in different languages had been a mistake and how that affected communities badly. As part of Bengali Wikisource community, I can only say, we are doing well and we don't want to return back to old multilingual Wikisource. Regards,

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Thanks for interest. I work mainly into it.source, but I often try to work a little bit into other projects too for a number of reasons. I find unknown templates, tools, policies, all from them very interesting; and I do too some effort to import them into it.source, but it's difficult, since

Re: [Wikisource-l] [Wikitech-l] Introducing WikiToLearn to developers

Your code modifications for http://wikitolearn.org/ are interesting. I'm pretty sure that KDE policies don't force you to fork MediaWiki extensions locally, so your patches are definitely welcome upstream. I'm not sure what you mean with your point about being rejected by the community;

[Wikisource-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] TPP - copyright

-- Forwarded message -- From: *Gnangarra* Date: Friday 6 November 2015 Subject: [Wikimedia-l] TPP - copyright To: Wikimedia Mailing List , " affilia...@lists.wikimedia.org" , Wikimedia Commons

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Hello, Some templates ought to be universally available but if that is the heart of the problem then that does not settle a call for a merge because the split brought other benefits and the template problems will be fixed eventually. Are there other problems associated with the split which have

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Alex Brollo wrote: > I work mainly into it.source, but I often try to work a little bit into other projects too for a number of reasons. I find unknown templates, tools, policies, all from them very interesting; and I do too some effort to import them into it.source, but it's difficult, since

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Unfortunately the communities use different languages. To improve the communication it's natural to split wikisource in different projects. The same is valid also to implement solutions because it is easier to do it in smaller communities than to find an agreement satisfying the whole

Re: [Wikisource-l] Wikisource birthday contest

Your link does not work: anyway, here there are the upadated dates... https://gist.github.com/Aubreymcfato/445ae33d78ef58f3b49c Aubrey On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > I've got a rough scoreboard here >

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

That's the same I have been thinking. It does not make sense to split it. Besides while for Wikipedia we have Belarussian Wikipedia in official and tarashkevitsa orthographies in wikisourse that would be one project. Russian Wikisourse hosts tests in pre-1918 (or whatever exact year)

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Maybe it is "fine" but I am afraid it is only "fine" for majority (that speaks English or at least one major European language). As an example, note, that there is very few discussion in Chinese in Village pump despite there is a lot Chinese users there and many of them do not speak English. It

Re: [Wikisource-l] Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Hi, During the recent Wikisource Conference in Vienna, need for global gadgets, templates and module was discussed and already it has been reported in Phabricator ( https :// phabricator.wikimedia.org