Re: [Wikisource-l] Analysed Layout and Text Object (ALTO)

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Brollo
I apologyze for using Italian, my aim was to send a personal reply to Nemo. Being a personal comment, it doesn't deserve an English translation, so ingore it please. Alex 2015-10-05 15:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Brollo : > Interessante; una conferma della mia vecchia idea che il "cuore di > wikisource"

Re: [Wikisource-l] Analysed Layout and Text Object (ALTO)

2015-10-05 Thread billinghurst
I don't disagree that this should be part of our long term vision, and those who can track this and advise the community on its development and implementation. That said, I don't see how we would be exporting to this or expanding to this in the wiki form. I have concerns that we have so many basic

Re: [Wikisource-l] Analysed Layout and Text Object (ALTO)

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Brollo
Interessante; una conferma della mia vecchia idea che il "cuore di wikisource" è il nsIndice, e l'unità di trascrizione +è la pagina in nsPagina ma è un'opinione isolata, sono stato contraddetto da chi (anche fra i wikisourciani di altissimo livello internazionale) è convinto che nsIndice e nsPagin

[Wikisource-l] Analysed Layout and Text Object (ALTO)

2015-10-05 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
I'm finding this document quite useful: http://www.succeed-project.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables/Succeed_600555_WP4_D4.1_RecommendationsOnFormatsAndStandards_v1.1.pdf See description of ALTO pasted below, which is a followup to https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikisource-l/2014-Septe