Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

Ad Huikeshoven, 08/02/2016 22:09: Please let me know if anything is missing at Wikimedia Discourse that the current wikisource-l mailing list does have. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Discourse#What_we.27d_lose_.28user_experience.29 Nemo

[Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

. Please let me know if anything is missing at Wikimedia Discourse that the current wikisource-l mailing list does have. Sign up for an account at https://discourse.wmflabs.org/ to discover the extras Discourse offers. Wikimedia Discourse users can earn barnstars for example, isn't that nice? Please

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

John Mark Vandenberg, 20/01/2016 01:57: A raw dump (including all metadata) export functionality should be a hard requirement for any software put into production in Wikimedia. Indeed. We don't have enough information to make any decision or even start considering things yet. I found my

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

If there is consensus, I can propose Wikisource-l for a test. Just tell me. Aubrey On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:57 AM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > wrote: > > I hate Discourse because it doesn't work

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

On 20/01/16 17:58, Andrea Zanni wrote: If there is consensus, I can propose Wikisource-l for a test. Just tell me. I'm supportive. Don't know if there's consensus yet. Nemo, have you had any experience using Discourse just via email? Would it work for you that way? (i.e. then doesn't

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

ikimedia.org/wiki/Discourse -- John Vandenberg ___________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

I'm amazed -- a non-mediawiki idea for discussion! ;) I reckon it'd be worth a try. People who don't want to use the web interface can still just post and reply via email. And I like the idea of non-threaded disucssion... it works really well on all the sites I've used it on. --Sam On

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I > end up on a discourse website I end up crying. > > Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features. > I thought

[Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html Discourse is a (great) software for discussion, and it could be very useful for giving order to the many mailing lists that we have in the

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

I vote for it. I'd be happy to serve as gunea pig :P On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Zanni wrote: > Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html > >

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I end up on a discourse website I end up crying. Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features. I thought I had added to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software but