> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Aryeh Gregor (Simetrical) wrote:
>> git works on all Unix-likes (including Linux and OS X) fine by command
>> line. It will also likely work in Cygwin without much trouble (again,
>> on the command line).
The problem of git on Windows is not executing it but ex
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> If you're going to correct someone's use of technical terminology like
> that, maybe you should explain what you think the difference is? To
> me, "branching" including the entire process of creating, maintaining,
> and re-merging branches, which seems to be precisely what Br
> 1) The bug was improperly labeled and could not be found when searching
> specifically for the request. This likely didn't help it to receive any
> attention! :)
It's in the "Language Setup" component of the "Wikimedia" product,
what more do you want?
> 2) Can you show us the language committee
Hoi,
* Why is it improperly labeled? This helps to prevent issues in the future.
* The mailing list of the language committee is available for members of the
language committee only. The language committee works by full consensus,
consequently when any one objects to something that needs approval
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Brion Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>> Hoi,
>> While you are at it, please have a look at bug 15013... It has been waiting
>> today for 121 days.. 121 days after registering in Bugzilla. If there are
>> any issues please let them be know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> While you are at it, please have a look at bug 15013... It has been waiting
> today for 121 days.. 121 days after registering in Bugzilla. If there are
> any issues please let them be known.
>
> https://bugzilla.wikimed
Platonides wrote:
> You could use svnsync to get a copy of the repository.
> Although I don't know about the speed of both approaches.
What SVK does is very similar to svnsync, and that is the point. The
svnsync is *slow* over the network. With a dumpfile, SVK allows a very
fast initial mirroring,
Hello Siebrand,
Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
> Hi Juliano,
>
> Thank you for that elaborate analysis. Aside from functionality comparison,
> I find one thing missing that would be important if the MediaWiki project
> were to facilitate another tool for SCM: multi platform support. Can you add
> some
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Aryeh Gregor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> git works on all Unix-likes (including Linux and OS X) fine by command
> line. It will also likely work in Cygwin without much trouble (again,
> on the command line). There are Windows GUIs available for git as
> well, wh
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Juliano F. Ravasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is probably not branching that you meant, but merge tracking.
If you're going to correct someone's use of technical terminology like
that, maybe you should explain what you think the difference is? To
me, "branc
On Saturday 15 November 2008 02:20:23 Chad wrote:
> Done in r43520. I've reverted r41710, r41978 r42012, and r42048 as a
> result.
Thanks, I guess.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/w
Fwiw, git works on windows now, at least to
some degree. I know there's a plugin for
Aptana now and I'm assuming it will work for
Eclipse in general.
-Chad
On Nov 15, 2008 5:07 AM, "Siebrand Mazeland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Juliano,
Thank you for that elaborate analysis. Aside from fu
Juliano F. Ravasi wrote:
> Do you remember that I asked you on IRC about
> providing an svn dump of the MediaWiki repository? SVK is able to use
> such a dump to bootstrap the mirroring process, making the initial
> repository clone *a lot* faster than git-svn.
You could use svnsync to get a copy
Don't received anything like this, on gmail too. Mention an example
maybe, so we can double-check ?
2008/11/15 K. Peachey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure if its a bug on GMail's end or what, but recent I've been
> getting emails from multiple different MediaWiki mailing lists that
> seem to ha
Hi Juliano,
Thank you for that elaborate analysis. Aside from functionality comparison,
I find one thing missing that would be important if the MediaWiki project
were to facilitate another tool for SCM: multi platform support. Can you add
some information on that, too, because I know that we have
Hi,
i didn't notice any emails without that info.
I think problems is on your end.
Cheers,
Huib
--
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SterkeBak
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listin
I'm not sure if its a bug on GMail's end or what, but recent I've been
getting emails from multiple different MediaWiki mailing lists that
seem to have no headers so it displays as (unknown sender) or (no
sender) and doesn't display in the "message thread" that it doesn't
appear to be meant to go i
17 matches
Mail list logo
