Yes, I heard about that one. Do you think it is more feasible to fix
Extension:StringFunctions or to just make a new, specialized one? -Greg
On Jan 5, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Chad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Greg L
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this venue so please have patience with me
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Greg L wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this venue so please have patience with me. Jimbo suggested
> I contact Erik and Erik said I should post here.
>
> Wikipedia authors of magic words and templates could really use a
> character-counting parser function. All the bac
Hi,
I’m new to this venue so please have patience with me. Jimbo suggested
I contact Erik and Erik said I should post here.
Wikipedia authors of magic words and templates could really use a
character-counting parser function. All the background information can
be found here:
http://en.wiki
Casey Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:00 PM, wrote:
>> MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for December 29, 2009 - January 05, 2009
>>
>> Status changes this week
>>
>> Bugs NEW : 0
>> Bugs ASSIGNED : 0
>> Bugs REOPENED : 0
>> Bugs RESOLVED : 0
>>
>
>
Understood--thank you. Any time-frame for when this might be launched?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On 1/4/09 6:20 AM, y...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
>> The current enwiki database dump
>> (http://download.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20081008/) has been crawling
>> along since 10/15/
On 1/4/09 6:20 AM, y...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
> The current enwiki database dump
> (http://download.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20081008/) has been crawling
> along since 10/15/2008.
The current dump system is not sustainable on very large wikis and is
being replaced. You'll hear about it when we have the
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
> 1) All links that I tested work on Firefox 3, IE5, IE5.5, IE6, and at
> least one version of recentish Opera. Still needs testing on IE7, IE8
> beta, WebKit, and older Firefox.
I've tested on IE7, and it works. I wasn't able to test on the o
I realize that. I'm looking forward to the the next dump :)
I had been used to a dump of that part about every 2 months, and it's
been about 3 now and the way it is headed it will be 12 before I see
another!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Russell Blau wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:1c624fe4
wrote in message
news:1c624fe40901040620g1c69d070q9f830da33e84f...@mail.gmail.com...
> The current enwiki database dump
> (http://download.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20081008/) has been crawling
> along since 10/15/2008.
...
> Is this purposeful? And is there anything I (or other community
> members)