This would break soo much, a lot of wikis have purposefully changed the
default messages for tracking purposes and other reasons. deleting these
messages would cause a lot of problems
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Eugene Zelenko
eugene.zele...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
We need to clean up old
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:52 PM, John Doe phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
This would break soo much, a lot of wikis have purposefully changed the
default messages for tracking purposes and other reasons. deleting these
messages would cause a lot of problems
I'm not sure you get it.
Aryeh Gregor schreef:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
The one thing missing in this discussion is a risk assessment and the
importance given to maintaing our infrastructure availability.
What's our? Jidanni is talking about backing up his
O. O. schreef:
I did not understand where I have to edit “imagemap_invalid_image” I am
new here, so I am not sure which file I have to edit.
You have to edit [[MediaWiki:imagemap_invalid_image]], which is a wiki
page, not a file.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
Hello List,
I know MW a little bit but not so well to avoid asking for hints here.
For research purposes, I am surveying code repositories of the top 10
web applications using a modified version of StatSVN.
Basically, I need to track source changes, over releases, in terms of
Lines
Hmm. There is an issue which has been raised before by Duncan Harris
on the en list:
The way I see it the Document referred to in the GFDL cannot be an
individual Wikipedia article. It has to be the whole of Wikipedia. If the
Document were an individual article then Wikipedia would be in
Roan Kattouw wrote:
O. O. schreef:
I did not understand where I have to edit “imagemap_invalid_image” I am
new here, so I am not sure which file I have to edit.
You have to edit [[MediaWiki:imagemap_invalid_image]], which is a wiki
page, not a file.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
Thanks Roan
Maggi Federico wrote:
Hello List,
I know MW a little bit but not so well to avoid asking for hints here.
For research purposes, I am surveying code repositories of the top 10
web applications using a modified version of StatSVN.
Basically, I need to track source changes, over
I think that's a good idea. But does flagged revs support unprotecting?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hello,
thanks for your quick contribution. By the way, I was browsing around
the repository and, beside its hugeness, I couldn't really find the
classic /branches /trunk /tags structure.
Am I pointing my client to the wrong repo?
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Platonides wrote:
Maggi Federico wrote:
The functions/lines I am interested in are those somehow involved in
handling HTTP request/session/response parameters. Of course, I allow
a certain roughness in the analysis.
I am trying to build a list of such functions/lines. What would you
suggest to
Maggi Federico wrote:
Hello,
thanks for your quick contribution. By the way, I was browsing around
the repository and, beside its hugeness, I couldn't really find the
classic /branches /trunk /tags structure.
Have you read http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Download_from_SVN ?
I have installed Mediawiki 1.14.0 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Download
and am trying to get the Cite Extension
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite version 1.14.0 to work.
When accessing the Main_Page I get the error:
Fatal error: Call to undefined method
Hoi,
What revision number does the working version for REL1_14_0 of Cite have ?
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/3/17 O. O. olson...@yahoo.com
I have installed Mediawiki 1.14.0 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Download
and am trying to get the Cite Extension
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
What revision number does the working version for REL1_14_0 of Cite have ?
Thanks,
GerardM
I don’t know what is “REL1_14_0 of Cite”??
Sorry I am new to this
O. O.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo
