2009/8/17 Hk kng hk@web.de:
New test results were added at
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/SVG_benchmarks
This looks even better than my first attempt. Nonetheless, it is clear
that batikd is not ready to use but needs to be worked on.
Nice one!
Has anyone set up Inkscape so it doesn't
* Platonides platoni...@gmail.com [Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:06:59 +0200]:
In fact, I'm not sure to have understood the problem. I find the
proposed options quite bizarre. So if you have understood the
specification, please enlighten me. :)
If I had to check whether there are any regressions between
Back in May 2004, Gabriel Wicke was creating a neat new skin called
Monobook. Unlike the old skins, it used good semantic markup with CSS
2 for style. Gabriel made sure to test in a lot of browsers and made
up files full of extensive fixes for browsers that had problems.
One such browser was
In theory at least all new checks in the last few years have been
specific in this way -- either testing for capabilities or if that's
not doable looking for particular versions (like the IE fixes which
are tied to known releases of IE, or the Gecko and WebKit fixes which
check if they're
2009/8/17 Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com:
I tried to remove some browser-sniffing from wikibits.js, but there's
undoubtedly some I missed. Especially with the large amounts of JS
being added recently for usability/new upload/etc., could everyone
*please* check to make sure that
On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:30, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
Both the usabilty and new upload JS use jQuery, which hides most
browser sniffing you need in abstraction layers. To my knowledge the
jQuery devs do sniff browsers properly, and if something should go
wrong in jQuery, it's
* Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org [Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:27:26 -0700]:
There should be no need for multiple servers in any case; web software
is pretty good about coexisting. ;)
Wouldn't a truly robust comparsion require two separate AMP's instead of
simple apache virtual hosts?
Multiple
