Re: [Wikitech-l] SQL

2009-09-07 Thread Mark Clements (HappyDog)
"Roan Kattouw" wrote in message news:f154f3a80909050742i90f5949vf0fad7962a154...@mail.gmail.com... > 2009/9/5 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima : >> But I don't know what to use in the SQL instead of the "WHAT?". >> Does anybody knows what should it be? >> > You should probably use "ORDER BY page_name

Re: [Wikitech-l] MW revision numbers on WMF (WAS: Upload API on Commons)

2009-09-07 Thread Mark Clements (HappyDog)
"Tisza Gergo" wrote in message news:loom.20090904t133359-...@post.gmane.org... > Chad gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jan Luca jans-seite.de> wrote: >> > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Version said that the version >> > of >> > Commons is r55629. >> > >> > Now

[Wikitech-l] Yeah, let's botspam Wikipedia. I'm sure that'll work out just fine.

2009-09-07 Thread Mike.lifeguard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 wrote: > What could possibly go wrong? > > http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/115582-wikipedia-linking-tool.html > > If your life is suffering from inadequate levels of stupid (I know! > Whose doesn't?), that looks like ju

Re: [Wikitech-l] __TOC__ handling

2009-09-07 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: > This is correct, but why there were some toc-related javascript inserted > into page parsed by command line script? To allow it to be collapsed by the user. > Since then command line scripts are learned to understand javascript? > Thats no

Re: [Wikitech-l] MW revision numbers on WMF (WAS: Upload API on Commons)

2009-09-07 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Mark Clements (HappyDog) wrote: > That brings up an interesting issue.  Now that the live WMF sites are based > on the wmf-deployment branch, should the code that works out the SVN > revision be reporting the version of trunk which it was based on, the > revision of

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikiEN-l] MediaWiki is getting a new programming language

2009-09-07 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
Hi! Is there any progress on this? Or, that's closed topic and such built-in language won't be implemented? By the way, the lots of MediaWiki installations use TeX, so OCaml is already available as the language for extensions. Imagine #ocaml parser function or an ocaml tag. It's not the most lig

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikiEN-l] MediaWiki is getting a new programming language

2009-09-07 Thread Tim Starling
Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: > Hi! > Is there any progress on this? Or, that's closed topic and such built-in > language won't be implemented? > By the way, the lots of MediaWiki installations use TeX, so OCaml is > already available as the language for extensions. Imagine #ocaml parser > function or