On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Mark Clements (HappyDog)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an extension called BugSquish, which I have been happily using on
> MediaWiki 1.6.10 for quite a long time. I am also aware of other people
> using it on later versions, but cannot cite specific version numbers where
Hi,
I have an extension called BugSquish, which I have been happily using on
MediaWiki 1.6.10 for quite a long time. I am also aware of other people
using it on later versions, but cannot cite specific version numbers where
it is known to work. The code works by performing a regex replace on
2009/10/7 Chad :
> "Adobe said that a Flash Player for the iPhone is not being made available
> because it uses a just-in-time compiler and virtual machine within a browser
> plug-in to play back website content - technologies that aren’t currently
> allowed on the iPhone." [1]
Apple does not li
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Steve Summit wrote:
>> I'm not up on the details of Flash, so this comment may be
>> misguided, but *if* the reason Apple restricts these unstated
>> "technologies" is for security reasons, then I'm quite glad A
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Steve Summit wrote:
> I'm not up on the details of Flash, so this comment may be
> misguided, but *if* the reason Apple restricts these unstated
> "technologies" is for security reasons, then I'm quite glad Apple
> does, and I'd say it's Adobe that deserves the snar
dgerard wrote:
> Are you *sure* we can't put a narky message when iPhone users click a
> video? Adobe do!
>
> http://twitpic.com/kf361
I'm not up on the details of Flash, so this comment may be
misguided, but *if* the reason Apple restricts these unstated
"technologies" is for security reasons, th
2009/10/6 Michel Vuijlsteke :
> 2009/10/6 David Gerard
>> Are you *sure* we can't put a narky message when iPhone users click a
>> video? Adobe do!
>> http://twitpic.com/kf361
>> (assuming it's real - can anyone with an iPhone please check?)
> It's real alright.
> Michel
I am of course ONLY JO
It's real alright.
Michel
2009/10/6 David Gerard
> Are you *sure* we can't put a narky message when iPhone users click a
> video? Adobe do!
>
> http://twitpic.com/kf361
>
> (assuming it's real - can anyone with an iPhone please check?)
>
>
> - d.
>
> _
Are you *sure* we can't put a narky message when iPhone users click a
video? Adobe do!
http://twitpic.com/kf361
(assuming it's real - can anyone with an iPhone please check?)
- d.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lis
David Gerard wrote:
> indeed ;-) Perhaps an International Unobfuscated ParserFunctions Context?
>
> - d.
There should be an alternative way to do:
{{#if: {{{foo|}}}|
{{!}}-
{{!}} Foo
{{!}} {{{foo}}}
|}}
Ie: If parameter foo exists, add it surrounded by a title and a table cell.
We would need an
* David Gerard [Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:30:51 +0100]:
> indeed ;-) Perhaps an International Unobfuscated ParserFunctions
> Context?
>
ah, just forgot to add: template parameters will be $1 in the
"interpreter
context", not a horrible {{{1}}} (keep it for the compatibility in
"wikitext context") .
Int
* David Gerard [Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:30:51 +0100]:
> 2009/10/6 Dmitriy Sintsov :
> indeed ;-) Perhaps an International Unobfuscated ParserFunctions
> Context?
>
I am not expert on this. The readability of templates can be improved:
if there were separate wikitext context and Parser interpreter cont
2009/10/6 Dmitriy Sintsov :
> * David Gerard [Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:16:08 +0100]:
>> http://codepad.org/cmQIjdzI
>> I suppose you can do that more easily than in ParserFunctions ...
> Any language can be abused. The problem is opposite: when you need to
> have clean, well-readable code, some langua
* David Gerard [Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:16:08 +0100]:
> http://codepad.org/cmQIjdzI
>
> I suppose you can do that more easily than in ParserFunctions ...
>
Any language can be abused. The problem is opposite: when you need to
have clean, well-readable code, some languages offer better help.
Dmitriy
_
Ryan Lane gmail.com> writes:
> The javascript you are outputting is dynamic content, and it is being
> cached by the parser cache. You can disable the parser cache on pages
> that use your extension
Thank you so much! It seems to be working as expected now after I disabled the
parser cache.
C
15 matches
Mail list logo
