Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:b4da1c6e0910061725m326860f1i402edfd9e6629...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Mark Clements (HappyDog)
gm...@kennel17.co.uk wrote:
[SNIP - Re: ParserAfterStrip]
On MW 1.14 and above the code within the nowiki tags is parsed
Hi all
The Memento Project http://www.mementoweb.org/ (including the Los Alamos
National Laboratory (!) featuring Herbert Van de Sompel of OpenURL fame) is
proposing a new HTTP header, X-Accept-Datetime, to fetch old versions of a web
resource. They already wrote a MediaWiki extension for this
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
I'd say it is, if sufficiently precise :)
MediaWiki only keeps timestamps to one-second precision, so it's not.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
hi Daniel, all,
Jakob Voss informed me that there had been a posting regarding memento
on this list. Since we are very keen on native Memento support for the
mediawiki platform, I felt like responding by giving some perspective
on Memento in general, and on some questions that were raised
On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Platonides wrote:
2.3. We have looked into another issue raised by Jakob: Display
deleted pages as they existed at the datetime expressed in X-
Datetime-
Accept. We have actually implemented this. There are 2 caveats:
- as is the case with mediawiki in general,
On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Platonides wrote:
2.6. The caching issue is a general problem arising from introducing
Memento in a web that does not (yet) do Memento: when in datetime
content negotiation mode all caches between client and server (both
included) need to be bypassed. As described
We have made some updates to the Memento extension and we have also
written a fix to perform datetime content negotiation on transcluded
templates. Details can be found in the wiki page for the extension
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Memento .
Harihar
(Los Alamos National Labs)
Hi Tim,
If there's a problem with viewing past versions of the main page, that's
perfectly okay -- it can be excluded from the resources that are datetime
content negotiable like the Special: pages.
I admit to not following the second issue completely. A regular robot would
never issue the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Herbert Van de Sompel
hvds...@gmail.com wrote:
2.1. The plug-in detects a client's X-Accept-Datetime header, and
returns the mediawiki page that was active at the datetime specified
in the header. Same for images, actually. This effectively allows
navigating
