Gabriel Wicke (gwicke): yes, *the* Gabriel Wicke, the man who wrote
the MonoBook skin and introduced us to Squid. We are in his debt and
he can work on whatever he wants.
Nathanael Thompson (than4213): has some grand plans for rewriting the
parser. We will see how it turns out in a branch.
Gurch:
So that I can respond to commit access requests in a more prompt and
standardised manner, I've set up an OTRS queue:
commit-access-reque...@wikimedia.org. I will get an email notification
when new tickets are opened in it. It has the same permissions as the
noc queue, but I imagine I'll be the only
emman...@engelhart.org wrote:
> mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our content and for this
> reason i wanted to
> speak about that on the ML.
You might have to be more specific than that. It doesn't seem like a
mandatory tool to me.
-- Tim Starling
_
Hi
Almost one month ago I have reported a bug in mwdumper which seems to me to be
critical.
I simply can't user mwdumper with the itwiki XML dumps:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22137
I have extract the problematic part of the XML but until now I do not have had
any remark
abo
On 02/11/2010 03:28 PM, Jack Phoenix wrote:
> Skin system rewrite currently supports old, SkinTemplate/QuickTemplate-based
> skins. For example, Vector uses SkinTemplate and QuickTemplate and it works
> well -- but as noted earlier, it won't support some of the new features
> (SkinAfterSidebar hook
Skin system rewrite currently supports old, SkinTemplate/QuickTemplate-based
skins. For example, Vector uses SkinTemplate and QuickTemplate and it works
well -- but as noted earlier, it won't support some of the new features
(SkinAfterSidebar hook and whatever else we may add in the future) until
i
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Conrad Irwin
wrote:
> This is great, just one question though - will "old-style" skins still
> be supported (for a few versions at least)? I have a dozen or so skins
> that currently work, it would be an absolute nightmare if I have to
> upgrade them all when Media
If this is merged after the 1.16 branching, and support for old skins would be
dropped from 1.17 on, you'll be able to use the old skinning system up to EOL
of 1.16 as a supported version, expected somewhere around March 2011 or a few
months later. Should give you ample time to prepare for Media
On 02/11/2010 02:31 PM, Jack Phoenix wrote:
> Wow, this sparked quite a discussion -- I'm pleased to hear that so many
> people are interested in reworking MW's skin system to make it better! :-)
>
> As per Tim's request, I've created a branch for this in r62304 and applied
> the initial patch in
Wow, this sparked quite a discussion -- I'm pleased to hear that so many
people are interested in reworking MW's skin system to make it better! :-)
As per Tim's request, I've created a branch for this in r62304 and applied
the initial patch in r62306. Feel free to check out the branch[1] and submi
Tim Starling writes,
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+filebug
Thanks, Tim.
After a quick look at the bug tracker and other docs, I can say the
issue had been reported long ago (at least a decade), and was on its way
to getting fixed a couple of years ago in Mailman 2.2. However, I'm not
11 matches
Mail list logo
