MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for June 14, 2010 - June 21, 2010
Status changes this week
Bugs NEW : 102
Bugs ASSIGNED : 9
Bugs REOPENED : 17
Bugs RESOLVED
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> Maybe it would be better to introduce non-standard (user-defined)
> attribute of element (tag), to indicate the type of table ("real table"
> or "layout table"), instead of breaking existing code? Then, screen
> readers could easily pick th
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tisza Gergo wrote:
> Anyway, removing table-related attributes doesn't offer much advantage in
> itself. There will be a few validator warnings about it, so what? Getting rid
> of
> table layouts would be nice, but IE6/7 do not understand display:table either,
> s
Marco Schuster harddisk.is-a-geek.org> writes:
> How big is the market share of such buggy browsers (and what are
> they)? I'd prefer progress and nice, clean code over having to keep
> old cruft just because some people still use middle-age browsers.
Amongst other things, IE6 and 7 do not under
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> 2010/6/20 Ryan Chan :
>>
> It should be noted that the API has an action=parse module that can
> parse arbitrary wikitext, so if you really want reliable parsing, you
> could install MediaWiki locally and call that module.
>
I am convert
2010/6/20 Ryan Chan :
> Hello,
>
> There are quite a few parsers seems fit my purpose
> (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Alternative_parsers).
>
> Before I try all of them, in your quick opinion, which one is stable
> enough/recommended to parse wiki markup to HTML?
>
It should be noted that the API
Hello,
There are quite a few parsers seems fit my purpose
(http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Alternative_parsers).
Before I try all of them, in your quick opinion, which one is stable
enough/recommended to parse wiki markup to HTML?
Thanks.
___
Wikitech-
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Tisza Gergo wrote:
> Those all have CSS equivalents, so all it would achieve is to make
> presentational tables look uglier in older browsers where the CSS versions of
> those attributes are sometimes buggy.
How big is the market share of such buggy browsers (and
Aryeh Gregor gmail.com> writes:
> Oh, I see. That's really terrible, then, and we should avoid
> presentational tables if at all possible. I think this really has to
> be done on the content side, though, not on the software side --
> auto-translating tables to divs sounds like a bad idea.
IE
