Andrew Garrett wrote:
> Aggregate preference data is available to
toolserver users the view omits
> the user ID field.
What are you talking about? Both user.user_options and user_properties are
unavailable to Toolserver users.
MZMcBride
___
Wikitec
On 11-02-09 11:28 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> 2011/2/10 Daniel Friesen
>> Since we've already got some of these, would you mind getting me some
>> aggregate data for skin preferences.
>>
>> In particular I'd like to know how many users across Wikimedia (en.wp,
>> maybe commons too might be enough
2011/2/10 Daniel Friesen
> Since we've already got some of these, would you mind getting me some
> aggregate data for skin preferences.
>
> In particular I'd like to know how many users across Wikimedia (en.wp,
> maybe commons too might be enough for that kind of stat for now) are
> using the lega
* "M. Williamson" [Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:29:06 -0700]:
> Would it be possible to get this information for es.wp and sv.wp?
>
There should be one table with all lang.wp and a column with male to
female ratio.
Dmitriy
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Howie Fung wrote:
> Just making sure I understand the data below. I'm assuming this means
> there are 13,959,842 total accounts in the English Wikipedia?
>
> Interesting because there are a total of 651,652 cumulative "New
> Wikipedians" (users with >=10 lifetime
Just making sure I understand the data below. I'm assuming this means
there are 13,959,842 total accounts in the English Wikipedia?
Interesting because there are a total of 651,652 cumulative "New
Wikipedians" (users with >=10 lifetime edits) as of Dec 2010. Which
would mean that only 4.7%
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> 2011/2/9 Ole Palnatoke Andersen :
>> Are the numbers available on a per-wiki basis, so we can point to them
>> and say "so-and-so many percent of our users self-identify as male,
>> female, and none-of-your-business, respectively"?
>>
> They'r
On 11-02-09 02:18 PM, DaB. wrote:
> Hello,
> Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 22:38:20 schrieb Brandon Harris:
>> Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we have a
>> little data to work with on the gender gap list?
> sure. I asked the toolserver-database:
> ...
>
> Say if you n
Would it be possible to get this information for es.wp and sv.wp?
Thanks
2011/2/9 DaB. :
> Hello,
> Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 23:36:12 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
>> Hoi,
>> I would be interested in learning sr and ru.
>
> sr.wikipedia:
> Male: 1666
> Femaile: 414
> All user: 78180
>
> ru.wikipe
How about da.wp?
TIA,
Ole
--
http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hello,
Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 23:36:12 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
> Hoi,
> I would be interested in learning sr and ru.
sr.wikipedia:
Male: 1666
Femaile: 414
All user: 78180
ru.wikipedia:
Male: 80491
Femaile: 23750
All user: 620393
pl.wikipedia:
Male: 12106
Femaile: 2999
All user: 414511
(
Hoi,
I would be interested in learning sr and ru. I understand that for these
languages the gender actually matters in the presentation in the user
interface.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 9 February 2011 23:18, DaB. wrote:
> Hello,
> Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 22:38:20 schrieb Brandon Harris:
> >
Awesome! Thanks!
On 2/9/11 2:18 PM, DaB. wrote:
> Hello,
> Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 22:38:20 schrieb Brandon Harris:
>> Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we have a
>> little data to work with on the gender gap list?
>
> sure. I asked the toolserver-datab
On 9 February 2011 23:09, Bence Damokos wrote:
>> The gender preference is actually marked as public in the preferences page
> already so it shouldn't be a violation of expectations to publish aggregate
> data.
Because it actually _is_ completely public, without any aggregation.
Ask {{gender:Catr
Hello,
Am Mittwoch 09 Februar 2011, 22:38:20 schrieb Brandon Harris:
> Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we have a
> little data to work with on the gender gap list?
sure. I asked the toolserver-database:
en.wikipedia:
Male: 233312
Femaile: 46973
All user: 13959842
The xmldatadumps branch I have mods to is only the python code; the
maintenance scripts run out of the deployment branch. When 1.17 is
deployed those are the versions that run.
Ariel
Στις 09-02-2011, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 23:08 +0100, ο/η Roan Kattouw
έγραψε:
> 2011/2/9 Jamie Morken :
> >
> > Hi Ari
We halted them because we can have bad data creep on during times when
the codebase is badly broken. I don't want to have to walk through and
detrmine later which 30 or 50 wiki dumps those are and toss them, so I
have them on hold til things are sorted out or until we have a date for
deployment th
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen
wrote:
> Are the numbers available on a per-wiki basis, so we can point to them
> and say "so-and-so many percent of our users self-identify as male,
> female, and none-of-your-business, respectively"?
I don't think the numbers would even tel
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> 2011/2/9 Ole Palnatoke Andersen :
> > Are the numbers available on a per-wiki basis, so we can point to them
> > and say "so-and-so many percent of our users self-identify as male,
> > female, and none-of-your-business, respectively"?
> >
> Th
You're the man, my friend.
On 2/9/11 2:06 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> 2011/2/9 Brandon Harris:
>> Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we
>> have a
>> little data to work with on the gender gap list?
>>
> I will run a query for you in the morning.
>
> Roan
2011/2/9 Jamie Morken :
>
> Hi Ariel,
>
> I don't really understand why the dumps need to be halted as I thought the
> mediawiki code and database dump code were basically two separate entities
> already*. I guess the 1.17 branch code changes the structure of the database
> causing potential er
2011/2/9 Brandon Harris :
> Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we have a
> little data to work with on the gender gap list?
>
I will run a query for you in the morning.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
See
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UserOptionStats
and https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25302
DieBuche
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011 at 22:46, Daniel Friesen wrote:
On 11-02-09 01:41 PM, Chad wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Harris wrote:
> > > On 2/9/11 1:
On 11-02-09 01:41 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Harris wrote:
>> On 2/9/11 1:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>>
>>> They're available to sysadmins only, because preferences are private
>>> data. Aggregate data about preferences is not currently published in
>>> an automated
Hi Ariel,
I don't really understand why the dumps need to be halted as I thought the
mediawiki code and database dump code were basically two separate entities
already*. I guess the 1.17 branch code changes the structure of the database
causing potential errors in the database dump? I also d
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Harris wrote:
>
> On 2/9/11 1:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>
>> They're available to sysadmins only, because preferences are private
>> data. Aggregate data about preferences is not currently published in
>> an automated fashion.
>
> Is it possible to g
On 2/9/11 1:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> They're available to sysadmins only, because preferences are private
> data. Aggregate data about preferences is not currently published in
> an automated fashion.
Is it possible to get a single aggregate report, just so that we have a
little dat
2011/2/9 Ole Palnatoke Andersen :
> Are the numbers available on a per-wiki basis, so we can point to them
> and say "so-and-so many percent of our users self-identify as male,
> female, and none-of-your-business, respectively"?
>
They're available to sysadmins only, because preferences are private
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen > wrote:
...
>> On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences, you can specify a
>> gender. Do we collect these data?
>>
>
> Preferences are stored in the database, so... yes?
Than
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen wrote:
> Perhaps this list is a better place for this question (got no answer
> on gendergap list):
>
> On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences, you can specify a
> gender. Do we collect these data?
>
Preferences are stored in t
Perhaps this list is a better place for this question (got no answer
on gendergap list):
On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences, you can specify a
gender. Do we collect these data?
-Ole
--
http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588
31 matches
Mail list logo
