"Aaron Schulz" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114543 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114543
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114543:
Added telecom.co.nz proxies and another maxonline.com.sg proxy
__
"Aaron Schulz" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114625 to "resolved"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114625
Old status: new
New status: resolved
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114625:
Temporary fix for bug 35578. Reintroduce validation to processForm().
___
"Aaron Schulz" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114627 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114627
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114627:
Removed debugging code
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview maili
On 31/03/12 09:56, Antoine Musso wrote:
> On March 30 2012 at 21:25, Platonides wrote:
>
>> How would you script that if you don't have the files? (as they are
>> pending a merge)
>> Could we have a branch which included all non-abandoned patches? Or
>> maybe all patches whose total feedback is no
On 31/03/12 12:34, Antoine Musso a écrit :
> As a workaround, you could configure your git client to use a global
> ignore list:
>
> $ git config --global core.excludesfile ~/.gitignores
>
> Then edit that file and add whatever you want :-D
Or if you are using the subgits command [1], you can c
"Platonides" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114646 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114646
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114646:
email
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-c
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r9909 to "resolved"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/9909
Old status: fixme
New status: resolved
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r9909:
follow-up to r9905 '-debug' replaced with new '-simulate' that allows switching
off write ac
Hi everyone,
I'm putting together the list of existing extensions that want to
be migrated with the next batch. Everyone who has an existing
extension and wishes to be migrated in this batch, please add
your extension and maintainer(s) to the page on mw.org[0].
I believe there was some confusion
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r9909 to "fixme" and commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/9909#c32585
Old Status: ok
New Status: fixme
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r9909:
follow-up to r9905 '-debug' replaced with new '-simulate' that allows switchin
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r9905 to "resolved"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/9905
Old status: fixme
New status: resolved
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r9905:
debugging '-debug' enabled for clean_sandbox
___
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r9909 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/9909
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r9909:
follow-up to r9905 '-debug' replaced with new '-simulate' that allows switching
off write access
Part of the gerrit slowness is that the web server is in eqiad and its
database is in pmtpa. We noticed some slowness of the interface when
moving the gerrit service to a new server. That said, the new server
handles the load much better, so overall it was worth the extra
latency.
We need to point
Thank you very much for your feedback Jeblad.
I will immediately look into how this can be best implemented by extending
the Mediawiki API.
Do kindly let me know about my other ideas so that I can shape my proposal
well.
The mentor for ideas I am interested in is Oren Bochman. But I couldn't
trac
"Nikerabbit" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114635 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114635
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114635:
followup to -r114620 - add svn prospet svn:keywords id
Le 31/03/12 10:17, Amir E. Aharoni a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We have dozens of repositories now. It's probably good that they are
> separate, but many of them have similarities in configuration, that
> should be synchronized.
>
> One of these is .gitignore. The content of this file is probably very
> s
Your point (a) "Implementing a wikiSumarizer widget which will give the
summary of the page being read by the user" could be extremely usefull for
a hover/ helpbubbles functionality where bubbles with a small explanations
are created within external articles. Such functionality imply creating an
ex
Hello,
I am Karthik from India - currently pursuing 3rd year Bachelors in Computer
Science and Engineering in PESIT, Bangalore.
I am interested in some of the projects proposed for Google SOC 2012 and
would love to work and contribute the same to the open-source world.
I am very attracted towards
I don't know of any easy way to do this.
-Chad
On Mar 31, 2012 4:17 AM, "Amir E. Aharoni"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have dozens of repositories now. It's probably good that they are
> separate, but many of them have similarities in configuration, that
> should be synchronized.
>
> One of these is .git
Minor nitpick: 'gerrit approve' is deprecated in favor of 'gerrit review'
-Chad
On Mar 30, 2012 7:50 PM, "Arthur Richards" wrote:
> I whipped together a php script this afternoon that allows you to make
> arbitrary queries for Gerrit change sets, and then perform bulk actions on
> the resulting
On 31 March 2012 10:56, Antoine Musso wrote:
> We already have the fixme feature. That is done by down voting a
> patchset in the codereview field (the infamous : "I would prefer that
> you didn't submit this").
No that isn't fixme. Fixme means "something needs fixing in this
commit which is alre
I put up an RFC earlier for native handling of entrypoints and 404
handling inside of MediaWiki:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Entrypoint_Routing_and_404_handling
I've begun the initial code in a branch:
https://github.com/dantman/mediawiki-core/compare/master...2012%2F404
Hi,
We have dozens of repositories now. It's probably good that they are
separate, but many of them have similarities in configuration, that
should be synchronized.
One of these is .gitignore. The content of this file is probably very
similar in most repos. Did anybody think about synchronizing i
On March 30 2012 at 21:25, Platonides wrote:
> How would you script that if you don't have the files? (as they are
> pending a merge)
> Could we have a branch which included all non-abandoned patches? Or
> maybe all patches whose total feedback is not negative.
One just have to fetch the non-merg
23 matches
Mail list logo
