David Gerard wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 18:05, Matthias Mullie wrote:
>> Technical issues are the reason for its slow ramp-up: the underlying
>> architecture does not yet allow us to safely deploy to 100% of enwiki and
>> we're currently working on resolving that.
>
> So is the AFTv4 data doin
On 14/09/12 17:26, Helder . wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any easy way to get to e.g.
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/65070
> from pages like this
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/core.git;a=commit;h=6e856741bc1080673dd7e244cb4ea9d224b3efab
> ?
>
> I didn't
It is (was?) enabled on at least a couple big wikis. See
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012/Mobile_banner
- I just disabled it on pl.wiki.
-- Matma Rex
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> So is the AFTv4 data doing anything or being used for anything?
I think that is unlikely, because the dashboard was never improved:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
So normal users do not have much access to the data.
Indee
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Philip Chang
Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Subject: Mobile site banner to promote the WLM App
To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition <
wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Dear WLM Members,
As of yesterday, a banner promoting
Slow ramp-up of AFTv5 is fine. I am curious about the slow retirement of
AFTv4.
בתאריך 14 בספט 2012 10:06, מאת "Matthias Mullie" :
> Hi,
>
> Technical issues are the reason for its slow ramp-up: the underlying
> architecture does not yet allow us to safely deploy to 100% of enwiki and
> we're cur
Diederik van Liere, 14/09/2012 19:18:
The Analytics Team is happy to announce the first version of
gerrit-stats. Gerrit-stats keeps track of the backlog of codereview for
Git individual repositories.
\o/
4) Will you add metrics for individual committers?
Right now, the unit of analysis is a r
Hi everybody,
The Analytics Team is happy to announce the first version of gerrit-stats.
Gerrit-stats keeps track of the backlog of codereview for Git individual
repositories.
Gerrit-stats dashboard is available at http://gerrit-stats.wmflabs.org
Currently, it has a few example charts but we can
On 14 September 2012 18:05, Matthias Mullie wrote:
> Technical issues are the reason for its slow ramp-up: the underlying
> architecture does not yet allow us to safely deploy to 100% of enwiki and
> we're currently working on resolving that.
So is the AFTv4 data doing anything or being used
Hi,
Technical issues are the reason for its slow ramp-up: the underlying
architecture does not yet allow us to safely deploy to 100% of enwiki and we're
currently working on resolving that.
Matthias
On 14 Sep 2012, at 09:18, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> That's more or less what I know. I just wo
That's more or less what I know. I just wonder why is this gradual
retirement so slow.
--
Amir
2012/9/14 Matthew Bowker :
> Amir,
>
> The Article Feedback version 4 is going to be phased out gradually. AFT5 is
> expected to be site-wide in November. For context, please see [1].
>
> Matthew Bo
Amir,
The Article Feedback version 4 is going to be phased out gradually. AFT5 is
expected to be site-wide in November. For context, please see [1].
Matthew Bowker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matthewrbowker
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AFT5
On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:34 AM,
Am 14.09.2012 16:15, schrieb Rob Lanphier:
> Please keep an eye out for other issues related to jQuery, since we
> may not have gotten everything. Rob
Just as info - perhaps this helps MediaWiki developers:
I discovered a general problem where jQuery 1.8.0 behaves totally
different from 1.7.2 wi
Hi,
Does Article Feedback v4, the one with the stars, have a future? Or is
Article Feedback v5 the only tool in the family for which there are
plans for Wikimedia-wide installation?
It would be nice to have clarity about it. If AFT v4 doesn't have a
future, then why is it still enabled on a lot o
Hi!
Is there any easy way to get to e.g.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/65070
from pages like this
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/core.git;a=commit;h=6e856741bc1080673dd7e244cb4ea9d224b3efab
?
I didn't find any reference to the revision number "65070".
B
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Baron wrote:
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=operations/mediawiki-config.git;a=blob;f=wikiversions.dat;hb=master
> is the place to look. Looks like all wmf11 to me. Also, seems to be missing
> from the noc.wm.o/conf file list.
Should be fixed with
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:10 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Daniel Friesen wrote:
>> Haven't both of the issues with re-introducing 1.8 already been marked as
>> fixed?
>
> No idea about this question directly, but the English Wikipedia is (and all
> Wikimedia wikis, I believe, are) now running 1.20wmf11
On Sep 14, 2012 9:11 AM, "MZMcBride" wrote:
> Daniel Friesen wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:07:43 -0700, Rob Lanphier
> > wrote:
> >> We've reverted MediaWiki from 1.20wmf11 to 1.20wmf10 in order to fix a
> >> problem with watchlists failing:
> >> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Daniel Friesen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:07:43 -0700, Rob Lanphier
> wrote:
>> We've reverted MediaWiki from 1.20wmf11 to 1.20wmf10 in order to fix a
>> problem with watchlists failing:
>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40103
>>
>> The root cause of this problem is a compati
I finally made some updates to the ShortURL builder tool.
- Error pages include a mailto link to report errors.
- I finally updated the output to match the updates made to
Manual:Short_URL/Apache (No Alias, replace %{REQUEST_FILENAME} with
something that works, and update the flags)
- I finally t
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:07:43 -0700, Rob Lanphier
wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've reverted MediaWiki from 1.20wmf11 to 1.20wmf10 in order to fix a
problem with watchlists failing:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40103
The root cause of this problem is a compatibility issue with jQuery
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:03:05 -0700, Mark Holmquist
wrote:
Has there been any discussion of CORS support in Mediawiki / WMF sites
anywhere?
There was some talk of it in bug 32890 [0] in UploadWizard, and I tried
to throw together code for it in a patchset [1], but I didn't spend much
time
I finally made some updates to the ShortURL builder tool.
- Error pages include a mailto link to report errors.
- I finally updated the output to match the updates made to
Manual:Short_URL/Apache (No Alias, replace %{REQUEST_FILENAME} with
something that works, and update the flags)
- I finally t
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:03:05 -0700, Mark Holmquist
wrote:
Has there been any discussion of CORS support in Mediawiki / WMF sites
anywhere?
There was some talk of it in bug 32890 [0] in UploadWizard, and I tried
to throw together code for it in a patchset [1], but I didn't spend much
time
24 matches
Mail list logo
