On 07.11.2012 00:41, Tim Starling wrote:
On 06/11/12 23:16, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
On 05.11.2012 05:43, Tim Starling wrote:
On 02/11/12 22:35, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
* For re-rendering the page, the wiki needs access to the data.
We are not sure about how do to this best: have it per cluster,
Hi,
At one wiki host there is 5.3.3-7+squeeze14 with apc 3.1.3p1 (both are quite
old however these are provided by Debian and I am not a regular admin of the
server).
The wiki host has about 10-20k visits per day and about 3500 of pages. It's not
the smallest wiki.
There is apc.ini (already
On 7 November 2012 03:09, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
..
== Feature detection
In most (if not all) cases of people using $.browser it is because they want
different behaviour for browsers that don't support a certain something.
Please
take a minute to look at the code and find out
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
You can tweak your Bugzilla settings so that, for example, if you're
just cc'd on a bug, you don't get email every time the keywords field
changes, the cc list changes, etc. If you believe you get too much
bugmail, this is a good place to
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 22:56 -0800, Daniel Friesen wrote:
Things with the lowest priority should be things that could be fixed.
But we've got no reason to implement ourselves.
LATER should be things that for some technical reason outside our control,
right-now we cannot fix.
Is
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:10 -0800, Quim Gil wrote:
Andre, I don't think we need a new resolution WAITING_FOR_UPSTREAM.
After reading Krinkle's and your email I agree that there is no urgent
need for it. This could still be reevaluated in the future.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia
Hi, am I the only one having difficulties understanding the proposal and
what it implies?
On 11/05/2012 07:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
we need to split the current department into an engineering dept
and a product dept in about 6-8 months.
It is strange to see engineering and product side by
+1. I love the fact that these sorts of things are being discussed
publicly, but I have no idea what the difference between product and
engineering is. I have a vague idea, like that ops probably falls
under engineering, and AFT like things probably fall under product.
However I wouldn't know
Quim,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, am I the only one having difficulties understanding the proposal and what
it implies?
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly
Thank you, Erik. Before (or rather than) commenting, I have a single
question below; the rest of the email is just a premise+addendum to it. ;-)
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are
On 07/11/12 22:21, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what
that means to most people. [...]
First of all, this will help greatly to the
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever the result, I hope we end up with teams where software developers,
sysadmins, product managers, designers etc are well mixed in focused teams
going after clear common goals.
Absolutely. Teams are assembled
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/11/12 22:21, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what
that
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your explanation but personally I'm more confused than before
about the difference between Engineering and Product, also because the
terminology didn't appear internally consistent. :-)
I feel like you,
On 07/11/12 22:56, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
As far as I can see, we then can get the updated language links before the
page
has been re-parsed, but we still need to re-parse eventually.
Why does it need to be re-parsed eventually?
And, when someone
actually looks at the page, the page does
Picking up this thread as Erik asked me to explain the different functions
that fall under Product. To do that, it's worth describing in a bit more
detail how our project teams work.
This may be a bit reductive (apologies in advance), but there are a basic
set of things that need to happen when
Hey folks,
I think all the conversation about this is really helpful, and it's
been particularly useful thus far to hear from community members about
what's confusing about the current and proposed structures. (Not
being confusing isn't the primary motivation for a restructure, but
it's obviously
17 matches
Mail list logo
