Hoi,
One reason to identify a language is to exclude it from being considered
part of another language. What follows is that a single string can and
should be identified as not being the base language for an article.
Functionally there are great reasons why you want to do this including
providing
On 25 April 2013 00:36, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Says who? I do not believe this is a requirement. It perhaps would be nice,
if done sanely, but not a requirement.
Says the GPL. To be specific:
I
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Praveen Singh prag...@gmail.com wrote:
I am Praveen Singh, a final Year Computer Science Graduate student at JIIT,
India. I wish to apply for GSoC 2013 and I am thinking about jQuery.ime
extensions for Firefox and Chrome as a project for the same.
...
Does
I am completely amazed by a particularly brilliant way that Wikipedia uses
Wikidata. Instead of simply displaying the data from Wikidata and removing
the local data, a template and workflow is proposed, which...
* grabs the relevant data from Wikidata
* compares it with the data given locally in
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
We already have the page lang support.
What do you mean by that? AFAICT there's no existing designated place
in the schema for associating a content language with a specific page.
Thanks,
Erik
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:00 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I'm not sure I'd call what you're proposing a major architectural
undertaking, though perhaps I'm defining a much narrower problem scope.
Yeah. A lot depends on whether or not we want language to be a first
class citizen at
On 2013-04-25 7:04 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
We already have the page lang support.
What do you mean by that? AFAICT there's no existing designated place
in the schema for associating a
2013/4/25 Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com:
On 2013-04-25 7:04 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
We already have the page lang support.
What do you mean by that? AFAICT there's no existing designated
On 2013-04-25 9:12 AM, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
2013/4/25 Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com:
On 2013-04-25 7:04 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
We already have the
I also prefer not to add magic words in the first place. But if it is
added, it shouldn't change the way the other magic words are
interpreted; only magic words from the wiki's language should be used.
Or no magic words at all - just use a language picker at the editing page.
--
Amir Elisha
On 04/23/2013 08:52 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the __TOC__ magic word. Out of interest - for
what reason do we support this? It seems like a bad thing to allow
inconsistencies between page content on the same wiki.
In some list articles, where the TOC is long and where each
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:59 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 April 2013 00:36, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Says who? I do not believe this is a requirement. It perhaps would be nice,
if done
Le 2013-04-24 19:44, Antoine Musso a écrit :
Hello,
This morning was very quiet so I have been bold and upgraded our Zuul
installation.
Excuse me, but what is Zuul?
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
___
Wikitech-l mailing
On 25 April 2013 15:18, Mathieu Stumpf psychosl...@culture-libre.orgwrote:
Excuse me, but what is Zuul?
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Zuul →
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Continuous_integration/Zuul
-- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]]
___
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
personal hat on
It certainly doesn't count as source code: The source code for a work
means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it
hardly describes minified JavaScript.
/personal hat on
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
personal hat on
It certainly doesn't count as source code: The source code for a work
means the preferred form of the work for making
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
But not in every individual compiled file.
Most likely, but even so, for some resources we don't convey the license
*anywhere*. In other words, if I have a JS file from an external library
that is not GPL licensed (maybe
I'm seeing a few reports that people are running into trouble running
MediaWiki on Apache 2.4.
The reports seem focused on XAMPP, but I tried to run MW against the
Apache 2.4 package on Debian and didn't succeed. Granted, I tried only
for 5 minutes or so.
Is this something we should document?
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.orgwrote:
I tried to run MW against the
Apache 2.4 package on Debian and didn't succeed
How exactly did it not succeed? That's a pretty serious bug.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major
On 04/25/2013 11:42 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
How exactly did it not succeed? That's a pretty serious bug.
I did say I didn't try very hard. I'm not sure php even works with
apache 2.4 which is labeled experimental on Debian.
So five minutes was about enough to apt-get the apache 2.4 package and
On 18 April 2013 17:32, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
TL;DR: VisualEditor will be deployed on 14 new Wikipedias next week as an
opt-in alpha. Your assitance is requested to inform your wikis about this
and help get the software translated.
This is now done (for de, nl, fr,
I am assuming you have already read about the project requirements and
also gone through the source files
Yes Runa I have read the project requirements thoroughly and also had some
overview of the source files.
Making the extensions is one part of the project. The primary aim is to
Hi James,
Great news!
Is the already given feedback publicly available? If yes, where.
Thank you.
Claudia
On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:09 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 18 April 2013 17:32, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
TL;DR: VisualEditor will be
The Ops team has been working on a document about best practices with
regards to production machines. If you have access to a production
machine, please read this document
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Server_access_responsibilities
--
Leslie Carr
Wikimedia Foundation
AS 14907, 43821
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you may have remembered reading. Huib--our longtime volunteer moderator
for mediawiki-l and wikitech-l--resigned from his positions back in
February[0].
I let this slip longer than I should've, but I'd
Additional pressure to update Special:Version is going to come when we
start using noun project icons -- like the ones that came out of the
Iconathon. The license there is CC-BY but they strongly recommend we put
statements to that effect in our 'About' pages for each image resource we
use.
I'll
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org
The Ops team has been working on a document about best practices with
regards to production machines. If you have access to a production
machine, please read this document
Hi,
as part of our ongoing efforts to remove all unused, non-cluster remnants
services from Tampa,
all of the following services have been permanently retired. (This means
removed from DNS, backup docroots and configs, then nuked. Almost all of
them had been temp. disabled in the past so it's
as of right now singer just has 2 services left:
contacts.wikimedia.org (going to rsync over to magnesium) RT-5018 (and it
has been upgraded thanks to Jeff)
and
secure.wikimedia.org -- here's my attempt to move to (Apache) cluster:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/60934/
everything else
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.orgwrote:
I did say I didn't try very hard. I'm not sure php even works with
apache 2.4 which is labeled experimental on Debian.
So five minutes was about enough to apt-get the apache 2.4 package and
dependencies and go to
On 2013-04-25 2:01 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
On 04/25/2013 11:42 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
How exactly did it not succeed? That's a pretty serious bug.
I did say I didn't try very hard. I'm not sure php even works with
apache 2.4 which is labeled experimental on
On 04/25/2013 08:40 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
I would say we shouldn't document unless we habe a vauge idea why.
Agreed. But I was basing this on reports from people who were using
XAMPP, not my lame attempts. Still, I haven't tried to reproduce the
XAMPP issue, either.
For now, I suppose this
On 04/25/2013 09:27 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
personal hat on
It certainly doesn't count as source code: The source code for a work
means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it
hardly describes
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I believe you're quoting GPLv3 (Conveying Non-Source Forms).
MediaWiki is under GPLv2 or later. Of course, that raises the question
of which version the WMF is trying to comply with...
Also irrelevant. ;) GPL v2
34 matches
Mail list logo
