Hi! Well, I was thinking that maybe both formats could coexist in the same
project/web, and as soon as somebody wants to export it, it would be
possible to convert the wikitext into latex and export both.
No idea if it would have any practical use, though.
Btw, great music! :)
Micru
On Tue, Au
Disregard the first point on that email. I misread the header.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> I'm a little confused:
>
>
>- Right
I'm a little confused:
- Right now it appears our SPF records just say to allow everything
(unless I should be checking something other than lists.wikimedia.org).
- Why was the bug marked as WONTFIX if it was actually FIXED?
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class o
Same here, funnily enough. Nothing in spam.
-Signalizing
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013, David Gerard wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 13:01, Federico Leva (Nemo)
> >
> wrote:
>
> > So, are you still seeing this happening?
> > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/52556 was wontfix'ed, but SPF rules were
> >
On 14 August 2013 13:01, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> So, are you still seeing this happening?
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/52556 was wontfix'ed, but SPF rules were
> actually added and all messages I receive now have spf=pass; however it's
> unclear how much this helps (it's surely not *the
So, are you still seeing this happening?
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/52556 was wontfix'ed, but SPF rules were
actually added and all messages I receive now have spf=pass; however
it's unclear how much this helps (it's surely not *the* source of the
problem).
Nemo
_
On 08/13/2013 01:36 PM, Yury Katkov wrote:
Hi Quim!
Looks reasonable. I would also differentiated Wikimedia chapters and other
3rd parties.
Yes, agreed. I just wanted to keep the writing simple with "WMF and
non-WMF". If we accomplish the first metric proposed we will have more
level of deta