Wenqin Ye wrote:
If we are creating an ai app that needs to get information , would we be
allowed to crawl wikipedia for this information? The app would probably be
a search query of some kind, that give information back to the user, one
of
the sites used is wikipedia. The app would use parts of
IMHO, the time when you had to invest time into crawling wikipedia
have long past. I'd recommend to use Dbpedia who have already crawled
a lot of data from wikipedia. They also have a tool for altering and
tuning their parsers, http://mappings.dbpedia.org .
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Wed,
Hello,
it's possible to add the Google Page Speed module on the wikipedia apache ?
For speed purpose.
I want to discuss with you of this possibility.
Thanks
Luke
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi Luke,
Max Semenik has already evaluated mod_pagespeed. You can see the report
here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:MaxSem/mod_pagespeed
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Luke Frank corte...@hotmail.it wrote:
Hello,
it's possible to add the Google Page Speed module on the wikipedia
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, at 12:42, Wenqin Ye wrote:
If we are creating an ai app that needs to get information , would we be
allowed to crawl wikipedia for this information? The app would probably be
a search query of some kind, that give information back to the user, one of
the sites used is
Note that Max's analysis is primarily centered around mobile and
MobileFrontend.
--
Tyler Romeo
On Sep 11, 2013 6:15 AM, Paul Selitskas p.selits...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke,
Max Semenik has already evaluated mod_pagespeed. You can see the report
here:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
Heya folks :)
Quite a while ago Ubuntu did a paper cuts initiative
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneHundredPaperCuts). Basically it was about
collecting and fixing small bugs/annoyances that were easy to fix but
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that Max's analysis is primarily centered around mobile and
MobileFrontend.
I'd say the analysis applies equally to the 'regular' desktop view as well.
Mobile and desktop both use ResourceLoader to batch and minify
Hi,
can you please explain to me from where is this information:
According to the people in charge of labs they dont care about
ensuring stability and that if stuff breaks Oh well well get to it
when we can. They say that tools is not a production service so we
really don't give a , if it breaks
tools.wmflabs.org is supposed to be the replacement for the toolserver
which the wmf is basically forcefully shutting down. I started the
migration several months ago but got fed up with the difficulties and
stopped. In the last month I have moved most of my tools to labs, and I
have discovered
On 11 September 2013 15:26, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that Max's analysis is primarily centered around mobile and
MobileFrontend.
I'd say the analysis applies equally to the 'regular' desktop view
There was a recent mail saying that Labs is not considered production
stability. Mainly a disagreement about how many 9s in the 99.9% that
represents.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
can you please explain to me from where is this information:
Despite it's known bug (even Ryan was telling me it has something to
do with nova) I could only find 1 bug so far...
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45868 maybe some should
be created, but people from ops know about this
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Andre Klapper
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.comwrote:
There was a recent mail saying that Labs is not considered production
stability. Mainly a disagreement about how many 9s in the 99.9% that
represents.
Indeed. I don't want to get into the debate about this
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 10:50 -0400, John wrote:
One good example of this is that a tool cannot connect to
tools.wmflabs.orgdue to a host configuration issue. This is a known
bug
Could you point out the corresponding ticket among
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:50 AM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
tools.wmflabs.org is supposed to be the replacement for the toolserver
which the wmf is basically forcefully shutting down. I started the
migration several months ago but got fed up with the difficulties and
stopped. In
And if your not sure where to start then take a look at our own FirefoxOS App.
https://github.com/wikimedia/WikipediaMobileFirefoxOS
--tomasz
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/09/calling-all-app-ports/
If you
I'm not sure this needed to be broadcast to three lists...
John wrote:
The toolserver was a fairly stable environment. I checked my primary host
I connect to and it has been up for 4 months with continuous operations.
I can only assume fairly was a typo for rarely. :-) I love the German
Hello Guys,
and for Firefox users, you can try FirefoxOS through the simulator
extension.
https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-br/firefox/addon/firefox-os-simulator/ ;-)
--
*Rodrigo Padula
Education Program Coordinator - Brazil
**Consultant for the Brazilian Catalyst Program at Wikimedia
19 matches
Mail list logo
