I just wanted to give progress report on some of the things that have
been happening with MediaWiki-Vagrant. You may have seen the
announcement a couple of weeks ago [0] about changes to the multiwiki
support and a long awaited Wikidata role. Since then we've had another
47 (!) changes land includi
On 21 August 2014 08:58, Isarra Yos wrote:
> On 21/08/14 13:13, Quim Gil wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm
>> wrote:
>>
>>> At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
>>> basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!) about creating a
>>> "gold stand
On 21/08/14 13:13, Quim Gil wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm wrote:
At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!) about creating a
"gold standard" for extensions, judging them based on their code
quality, comp
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:58 PM, aude wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
>> wrote:
>> > There are build errors in the mediawiki builds on travis-ci, which
>> > have been happening for four months.
>>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, John Mark Vandenberg
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
> > There are build errors in the mediawiki builds on travis-ci, which
> > have been happening for four months.
> >
> > https://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/mediawiki-core/bu
+ QA list
-Jeremy
On Aug 18, 2014 1:23 PM, "John Mark Vandenberg" wrote:
>
> There are build errors in the mediawiki builds on travis-ci, which
> have been happening for four months.
>
> https://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/mediawiki-core/builds
>
> Is anyone using that to help with development. I d
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
> There are build errors in the mediawiki builds on travis-ci, which
> have been happening for four months.
>
> https://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/mediawiki-core/builds
Are there any other travis-ci builds running on the wikimedia account
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm wrote:
> At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
> basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!) about creating a
> "gold standard" for extensions, judging them based on their code
> quality, compatibility with MediaWiki versi
