This sounds like a pretty cool idea to work on. I'll leave some comments on
the Phabricator task.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The day Extension:Newsletter is
I've gone ahead and flipped a long-requested config change for
DismissableSiteNotice (which controls local, not Central, site notices) to
allow anons to dismiss them.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/193090/
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T59732
IIRC the only reason the dismiss wasn't
2015-02-26 19:11 GMT+02:00 Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org:
I've gone ahead and flipped a long-requested config change for
DismissableSiteNotice (which controls local, not Central, site notices) to
allow anons to dismiss them.
Thanks, thanks, thanks!
Strainu
The gallery tag generation has been updated to include srcset attributes
for high-density displays: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64709
An unfortunate consequence is that if extensions have parser test cases
including a gallery they will need to be updated for the new HTML.
The only one I
On Feb 26, 2015 2:03 PM, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The gallery tag generation has been updated to include srcset attributes
for high-density displays: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64709
An unfortunate consequence is that if extensions have parser test cases
including a
I was supposing that the Wikimedia Foundation would be willing to run
the W3C Validator on their servers.
Now I ask: is it feasible?
Il 17/12/2014 17:57, Ricordisamoa ha scritto:
I've written a simple MediaWiki extension that uses an instance of the
W3C Validator service (via the
The day Extension:Newsletter is deployed, everybody will ask themselves why
didn't we have this feature before.
While this happens, I keep trying to find a GSoC / Outreach co-mentor, and
now a hackathon buddy in Lyon just in case this alternative model works
better. Someone willing to write a
