Re: [Wikitech-l] planned Phabricator upgrade tomorrow

2019-05-22 Thread Daniel Zahn
It took a bit longer than expected but this is now done and we are read-write again and serving Phabricator from the new server phab1003. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread RhinosF1 Wikipedia
Got back on IRC and apergos showed me https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments/One_week which is probably the most simple. Thanks all! And good luck with fixing everything and the remainder of the train. RhinosF1 On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 18:36, Bryan Davis wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at

Re: [Wikitech-l] Scrum of scrums/2019-05-22

2019-05-22 Thread Pine W
Regarding the request for feedback on SoS meetings, for me these notes are frequently interesting and occasionally useful in their current form. I like having the placeholders for teams so that I can get a sense of what teams currently exist and how they are named. However, my guess is that these a

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread Bryan Davis
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:35 AM Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 17:29 +0100, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote: > > what's on Group 1 > > See the dropdown on https://tools.wmflabs.org/versions/ The TL;DR answer for what is in each group is basically: * Group 0 == mediawiki.org, "testing" w

Re: [Wikitech-l] Scrum of scrums/2019-05-22

2019-05-22 Thread Željko Filipin
I have forgot link to HTML version 🤦‍♂️ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2019-05-22 Željko On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:50 PM Željko Filipin wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to highlight a few notes from SoS Meeting Bookkeeping: > > * We're still looking for a backup facilitator. 👀 > *

[Wikitech-l] Scrum of scrums/2019-05-22

2019-05-22 Thread Željko Filipin
Hi, I would like to highlight a few notes from SoS Meeting Bookkeeping: * We're still looking for a backup facilitator. 👀 * We're still looking for feedback if this meeting is useful. If it is, is there anything we could do to make it more useful? ** SoS is really useful to Release Engineering be

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 17:29 +0100, RhinosF1 Wikipedia wrote: > what's on Group 1 See the dropdown on https://tools.wmflabs.org/versions/ andre -- Andre Klapper | Bugwrangler / Developer Advocate https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l maili

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread Lucas Werkmeister
You can see a full list on the Wikimedia MediaWiki versions tool . Am Mi., 22. Mai 2019 um 18:30 Uhr schrieb RhinosF1 Wikipedia < rhino...@gmail.com>: > Looks like IRCCloud is having issues for me, would have asked in -tech but > what's on Group 1 > > On Wed,

Re: [Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread RhinosF1 Wikipedia
Looks like IRCCloud is having issues for me, would have asked in -tech but what's on Group 1 On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 17:14, Antoine Musso wrote: > Hello, > > When promoting group1 to MediaWiki 1.34.0-wmf.6, cawikinews has been > unreachable for roughly half an hour. > > The reason is that very ea

[Wikitech-l] 1.34.0-wmf.6 status and cawikinews outage

2019-05-22 Thread Antoine Musso
Hello, When promoting group1 to MediaWiki 1.34.0-wmf.6, cawikinews has been unreachable for roughly half an hour. The reason is that very early in the process of loading the wiki, a PHP fatal error occurred. I thus roll backed cawikinews to 1.34.0-wmf.5 which fixed it: https://phabricator

Re: [Wikitech-l] planned Phabricator upgrade tomorrow

2019-05-22 Thread Pine W
OK, thanks for the info. Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) On Wed, May 22, 2019, 03:01 Mukunda Modell wrote: > Indeed, routine Phabricator maintenance is scheduled to take place every > Wednesday at 0:00 UTC. > This maintenance window is not always utilized as we only make chan

[Wikitech-l] Scrum of scrums/2019-05-15

2019-05-22 Thread Željko Filipin
Hi, apologies for sending meeting notes late. I was at Wikimedia Hackathon in Prague. For HTML version see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2019-05-15 Željko -- = 2019-05-15 = == Callouts == * Try the new Wikistats Time Selector - https://wikistats-canary.wmflabs.org/time-select

Re: [Wikitech-l] "Patch-For-Review" tag in phabricator

2019-05-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 11:56 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Have you considered using a dedicated bot account for these actions? Ah, we're discussing this in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T224099 andre -- Andre Klapper | Bugwrangler / Developer Advocate https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___

Re: [Wikitech-l] "Patch-For-Review" tag in phabricator

2019-05-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 23:40 +0200, Amir Sarabadani wrote: > So I wrote a bot to clean those tags. Thanks! Looks like you fixed https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1149 ? Currently the bot seems to use the @Ladsgroup Phab account? Have you considered using a dedicated bot account for these actions?

Re: [Wikitech-l] "Patch-For-Review" tag in phabricator

2019-05-22 Thread Mukunda Modell
If you do the edits as a bulk edit job I can flag it to run silently which will spare people the email spam. On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:53 PM Amir Sarabadani wrote: > Hey, > It's already stopped and running them on open tasks only for now sounds > like a good idea. > > Let me do that. > > On Tue,

Re: [Wikitech-l] planned Phabricator upgrade tomorrow

2019-05-22 Thread Mukunda Modell
Indeed, routine Phabricator maintenance is scheduled to take place every Wednesday at 0:00 UTC. This maintenance window is not always utilized as we only make changes once or twice each month. When there is a maintenance task, typical downtime is less than 5 minutes. When nothing needs to be done f

Re: [Wikitech-l] planned Phabricator upgrade tomorrow

2019-05-22 Thread Lewis Cawte via Wikitech-l
To answer the first part of your question, Pine, Daniel's email was sent at 01:52 UTC on the 22nd. So tomorrow would refer to 00:00 on the 23rd. -- Lewis Cawte (Lcawte) On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 07:26, Pine W wrote: > Hi, thanks for the notice. Can you specify whether "tomorrow" refers to 22 > May