Re: [Wikitech-l] 1st CfP: SEMANTiCS 2021 EU || Sep 6 - 9, 2021 || Amsterdam, The Netherlands

On 25/12/2020 11:32, Max Semenik wrote: On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Sebastian Hellmann > wrote: Apologies for cross-posting Apologies not accepted. Don't know about others on this list, but I'm tired of your spam of conferences very remotely

Re: [Wikitech-l] Drop support for PHP 5.3

On 20/02/14 05:17, Jamie Thingelstad wrote: Regarding PHP 5.3 support, I put together a quick report in WikiApiary showing the versions of PHP in use across wikis. https://wikiapiary.com/wiki/PHP_Versions In short, 5.3 is the most common PHP version used by a large, large majority. Three thing

Re: [Wikitech-l] [ANN] Semantic Web Journal: Special Issue on Multilingual Linked Open Data (MLOD) 2012

it makes the relevancy so much less. I disagree with you that Wikidata does not cover multilingual data, but that seems to be a topic for the wikidata list. Cheers, Markus Thanks, Gerard On 3 November 2012 23:39, Markus Krötzsch wrote: Sebastian, I don't think it is appropria

Re: [Wikitech-l] [ANN] Semantic Web Journal: Special Issue on Multilingual Linked Open Data (MLOD) 2012

narrow view of the publication landscape). For example, I also got your call through three other lists. Cheers, Markus Thanks again and all the best, Sebastian Am 03.11.2012 23:39, schrieb Markus Krötzsch: Sebastian, I don't think it is appropriate to post such calls here. This list

Re: [Wikitech-l] [ANN] Semantic Web Journal: Special Issue on Multilingual Linked Open Data (MLOD) 2012

Sebastian, I don't think it is appropriate to post such calls here. This list is not about any of the topics that your email or the linked web page refers to. You can have a look at the wikitech-l archives to see what kind of communication this list is used for. Best regards, Markus On 02

Re: [Wikitech-l] Adding additional data to the ParserOutput

P.S.: I have now seen that the discussion on gerrit is actually already a lot further than in this thread. Looks like we have a feasible conclusion there already. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/28767 On 20/10/12 17:15, Markus Krötzsch wrote: Hi Daniel, hi Jeroen, hi all, On 20/10/12 16:47

Re: [Wikitech-l] Adding additional data to the ParserOutput

Hi Daniel, hi Jeroen, hi all, On 20/10/12 16:47, Daniel Friesen wrote: On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:14:36 -0700, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: Hey, Daniel, thanks for your suggestion. Going on the little documentation, "Name/value pairs to be cached in the DB", it seems that everything added via setPrope

[Wikitech-l] Fwd: SMWCon Fall 2012 Program

[Forwarded from semediawiki-user, apologies for cross-posting] (This is about the Semantic MediaWiki User Conference Fall 2012, see http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SMWCon_Fall_2012) Dear all, the program for the upcoming SMWCon in Cologne is becoming more and more stable [1]. Most talks shou

Re: [Wikitech-l] GreenSMW (GSoC)

On 21/08/12 15:34, Platonides wrote: On 21/08/12 14:47, Nischay Nahata wrote: Hi, Its been a wonderful time working on SemanticMediaWiki this summer as part of my Google Summer of Code project GreenSMW. While most of the planned milestones have been reached, I am still working on more improveme

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC - Green SMW

students. Markus On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:41 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: On 04/04/12 06:01, Gregory Varnum wrote: I'll admit - I'm intrigued by the notion of carbon footprint reduction via software enhancements.. :) I appreciate that you've concisely provided background on the what

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC 2012

Dear Sudeep, note that the proposal for "Semantic form rules" is proposed and mentored by Stephan Gambke, who is a contributor to MW/SMW. I am not sure if he is reading this list. I have contacted him now, but if you do not hear from him very soon, I suggest to focus on one of the other proje

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC - Green SMW

On 04/04/12 06:01, Gregory Varnum wrote: I'll admit - I'm intrigued by the notion of carbon footprint reduction via software enhancements.. :) I appreciate that you've concisely provided background on the what and how. I'm curious if you can expand a tad more on the why. To many the notion

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wording (RE: SOPA banner implementation)

On 17/01/12 15:01, Daniel Barrett wrote: >> http://test.wikipedia.org/?banner=blackout > > As a writer, I believe the current message ("The Wikipedia community has > authorized...") is long and wordy and therefore not likely to be read by most > users. I recommend shortening& simplifying it. Her

[Wikitech-l] SMWCon 2011 registration now open

[All apologies for cross-posting] We are happy to announce that you can now register for SMWCon Fall 2011 Berlin, September 21–23, 2011 http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SMWCon_Fall_2011 Registration is at http://de.amiando.co

Re: [Wikitech-l] Spay or neuter your jQuery libraries before they multiply!

On 10/05/11 23:31, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > >> Trust me, I've learned to leave SMW alone, lest I get eaten by you and > Yaron. > > Help is welcome, but please be aware of what we are trying to do, so you > don't end up doing counter-productive work. I think this is a quite > reasonable reques

Re: [Wikitech-l] Making code review happen in 1.18

On 16/02/2011 07:53, Chad wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Ashar Voultoiz wrote: >> On 14/02/11 15:11, Roan Kattouw wrote: >>> By the time we deploy 1.17, trunk will >>> already be more than two months ahead. Of course this is because we >>> needed time to stabilize 1.17, which in turn wa

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

On 13/11/2010 00:36, Happy-melon wrote: > > "Max Semenik" wrote in message > news:97939612.20101113002...@gmail.com... > >> Frankly, I don't like it. The current logo has the advantage of >> looking *alive*. The new design looks plastic and dead, the sunflower >> is less recognisable. > > I agree,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

On 11/11/2010 21:37, Marco Schuster wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM, David Gerard wrote: >> On 11 November 2010 19:55, MZMcBride wrote: >> >>> The muted colors are a nice start, but I think the yellow still really >>> sticks out when the logos are presented as a family. Maybe the petal c

Re: [Wikitech-l] Backward compatibility guidelines

On 09/11/2010 19:08, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch > wrote: >> The proposed backward compatibility page says that trunk extensions >> are only compatible with the current MW version. This implies that it is not >> possible to clea

Re: [Wikitech-l] Backward compatibility guidelines

On 05/11/2010 16:23, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > We just had a discussion in #mediawiki about this commit: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/76064 > > It removed wfLoadExtensionMessages() from dozens of extensions in > trunk. With trunk MediaWiki, this causes no problems, since th

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Semediawiki-user] Maps: marker specific parameters

On 19/07/2010 07:58, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > > Currently the Maps extension [0] allows you to specify marker specific > data > [1] (a titel, further text, and the icon to use). The way this is done is > not very clean, and needs improvement. Someone poked me about this at > Wikimania, but I

Re: [Wikitech-l] CodeReview auto-deferral regexes

On 20/07/2010 16:25, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > > That would be completely awesome! Yes, that would help a lot, although it might be appropriate to still auto-defer reviews for some extensions in this queue, depending on whether or not enough reviewing happens for them (calling an extension

Re: [Wikitech-l] [gsoc] splitting the img_metadata field into a new table

rties of the page might suffice to accomplish this on the DB level. I am fairly agnostic about the details, but I have a tendency to wait with developing a more sophisticated DB layout until we have some usage statistics from the initial deployment to guide us. -- Markus > > Markus Krötz

Re: [Wikitech-l] [gsoc] splitting the img_metadata field into a new table

nd metadata-category intersections. I'm not planning > to do this as part of my project, as I believe that would have > performance issues. However doing a metadata table like this does > leave the possibility open for people to do such intersection things > on the toolserver or in a

[Wikitech-l] MediaWiki memory usage

in SMW or MW could help to reduce the problem at its source. Maybe it would help to know which aspects of parsing a table are having the highest impact on MW's memory usage. Or is this a PHP issue? Any relevant insights/pointers are welcome, Markus -- Markus Krötzsch * Perso

Re: [Wikitech-l] Announcing Semantic Bundle

iaWiki itself, and in fact > at the moment it's a modified, patched version of MW, which makes SMW+ > somewhat more of an application in itself. So Semantic Bundle may be the > first "pure" package of extensions. > > -Yaron Koren > __