On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Not sure what's a good solution for this, other than a really good
> download/sharing UI on images...
Maybe the most obvious solution would be for Mozilla and Microsoft and
the usual bunch of image editors to start supporting WebP. There are
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Another possibility is to preferably load images on view/section expansion
> via JavaScript, which can potentially give you a chance to query the format
> compatibility in client JS and avoid any HTTP-level negotiation. (And also
> doesn't lo
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Denny Vrandečić
wrote:
> That looks like a cool idea.
>
> I am trying to experiment it on a few pages, and it seems to considerably
> reduce the number of web requests (for
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh it goes from 120 to under 40
> requests).
>
Hi everyone,
Magnus was very kind to implement an idea that consists of two parts:
1. use of WebP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP) instead of PNG/JPEG
for thumbnails in Wikipedia articles
2. use of Data-URIs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme) to
inline incluse those thumbnails.
T
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Some people -- you can include me in this -- *actively* hate WYSIWYG editing,
my comment was in no way about the pros and cons of WYSIWYG editing
and the decision at Wikimedia to have its own turing complete language
for content. My comment
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Magnus Manske
wrote:
> What I would like is some discussion about
> * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable
> perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go
> * if the code I wrote would be a suitable basis for a system we can
> throw at the general p
2009/9/18 Erik Zachte :
> I think it is extremely important to keep these files for later analysis by
> historians and others.
>
> Mathias Schindler also keep an archive or at least did till April (Berlin
> conference).
> He even bought a dedicated external drive for it.
R
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Stephen Dunn wrote:
> It is located here -
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Word_of_the_day/Archive
> How do I get to the xml file?
You might get lucky using this
http://download.wikimedia.org/enwiktionary/20090111/enwiktionary-20090111-pages-meta-histo
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Mark Clements (HappyDog)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias_by_sample_of_articles
Thanks!
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimed
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Lars Aronsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What other estimates of Wikipedia quality do we have, that can be
> applied across language versions?
The completeness of
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have
and the ratio of the qu
10 matches
Mail list logo