Looking forward to remote beer tasting! Send a list before so I can
prepare. Also someone let Siebrand know about this :D
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:50 PM RhinosF1 - wrote:
>
> Added, let the fun begin!
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 14:44, Andre Klapper wrote:
>
> > Heja,
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-04-20
6, 2020 at 3:54 PM Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 5:24 PM Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>>
>> Am 05.04.20 um 23:18 schrieb Petr Bena:
>> > But still, I am curious what is the recommended approach for someone
>> > who wants to develop their appl
k in progress. While support is not complete in all parts
> of
> MediaWiki, the storage layer has been implemented and the database has been
> migrated to the new system.
>
> Am 05.04.20 um 22:17 schrieb Petr Bena:
> > Hello,
> >
> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wi
Hello,
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Revisions mentions "revision slots"
multiple times, but fails to explain what it is?
I noticed that some queries that were running fine in the past now
have warning: "Because "rvslots" was not specified, a legacy format
has been used for the output. This
NVM, I just figured out that MW and Gerrit was creating duplicated
accounts due to this
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:16 PM Petr Bena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> What was the reason for this change? What does it improve or fix?
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:00 PM Andrew Otto wr
Hello,
What was the reason for this change? What does it improve or fix?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:00 PM Andrew Otto wrote:
>
> Great! Is this just for Wikitech itself or all ldap/wikitech
> authentication?
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:56 PM Bryan Davis wrote:
>
> > A change was deployed to
ast time I checked.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Bence Damokos wrote:
> Pedants?
> Prescriptivists? Etc... https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/grammar_Nazi
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, 18:10 Petr Bena, wrote:
>
>> Out of curiousity, how would you say "grammar nazi"
h…I’d go with
> bully.
> _
>
> Joe Matazzoni
> Product Manager, Collaboration
> Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco
> mobile 202.744.7910
> jmatazz...@wikimedia.org
>
> "Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
2018 om 18:10 heeft Petr Bena het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>> Out of curiousity, how would you say "grammar nazi" or "language nazi"
>> with absence of word "nazi" so that it still has same effect and
>> doesn't sound dull?
>
> A per
Out of curiousity, how would you say "grammar nazi" or "language nazi"
with absence of word "nazi" so that it still has same effect and
doesn't sound dull?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Bináris wrote:
> 2018-08-13 18:35 GMT+02:00 Petr Bena :
>
>> I
other and the less powerful person in any conflict. We have a duty to
>> > speak up, a duty to keep abusers from their target, we own this social
>> > space and have to maintain it together. If you see where I'm headed?
>> > Rewriting the CoC in a positive rights framew
I am a bit late to the party, but do we seriously spend days
discussing someone being banned from a bug tracker just for saying
"WTF", having their original comment completely censored, so that the
community can't even make a decision how bad it really was? Is that
what we turned into? From highly
Oh and I totally forgot to include link to phab task:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201784
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to do some major changes to two factor auth. I am cross
> posting this on phabricator and the mailing list to
Hello,
I would like to do some major changes to two factor auth. I am cross
posting this on phabricator and the mailing list to give it some more
attention and to start some proper discussion before anyone starts
working on this:
Right now there are only two options for two factor
Hello,
Interesting, but I think that more data should be collected about the
tools, especially the technologies and programming languages used, so
that another similar portal could be built with these data for
programmers / volunteers looking for a technical project to work on.
IDK what is
Speaking of security, I believe that all sysops and people allowed to
edit JS / CSS anywhere on mediawiki sites should be required to use
2FA.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:28 PM Petr Bena wrote:
>
>> Is there any historical evidence
OK in that case I think this should be done.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Thiemo Kreuz wrote:
>> Is there any historical evidence that sysops being able to edit JS / CSS
>> caused some serious issues?
>
> Oh yes, this happens more often than I feel it needs to. I remember a
> situation when
Is there any historical evidence that sysops being able to edit JS /
CSS caused some serious issues? Your point that "most of
administrators don't understand JS / CSS" is kind of moot. They are
usually trustworth and intelligent people. They don't mess up with
something they don't understand and
Are we running same firefox? I have same experience like you, but with
Chrome. Firefox is best performing and rock solid compared to anything else
to me and I run it on all my computers including virtual boxes, with ~100
tabs I achieved months of uptime with no crash. Can't say this about chrome
iewing all
>> > projects they want to change. AFAIK this was requested in the community
>> > wishlist.
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > st 10. 5. 2017 v 9:20 odesílatel Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> napsal:
>> >
>> >> H
Hi all,
We have central auth, global user pages and stuff like that, do we
have some kind of global preferences too? So that one could set
interface language to English and have it like that on every single
project they work on?
I don't really see a need to have different projects with different
Hello,
Thanks for the info, this means that we need to switch from RCStream, is
there any working example code, preferably written in Python or any other
sane terminal friendly language (eg. not html or JS) that is capable of
connecting to this stream and obtaining at least identicat information
Hi folks,
Just letting you know that wm-bot logs will not be available for a day
or two, reason is required migration to different OS as current OS is
no longer accepted on wikimedia labs and all instances that are
running it have to be terminated.
If you want to track progress see
Hello,
I don't like to sound like a bad guy, but I really find it quite
inappropriate to discuss this sort of stuff on a public mailing list.
This really is a personal matter. If he didn't post any dramatical
announcement perhaps he wanted to "leave quietly"?
You know, people sometimes do this
------
> Od: Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com>
> Komu: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Datum: 21. 10. 2016 0:44:50
> Předmět: Re: [Wikitech-l] irc.wikimedia.org (kraz) reboot
>
> "Or you can fix them by using alternative RC providers:
> h
Or you can fix them by using alternative RC providers:
http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/RCFeed
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Daniel Zahn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is to let you know that kraz, the server that runs irc.wikimedia.org
> had to be rebooted for a kernel upgrade.
Can you give us some justification for this change? It's not like when
downloading dumps you would actually leak some sensitive data...
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ariel Glenn WMF wrote:
> We plan to make this change on April 4 (this coming Monday), redirecting
> plain
I noticed that since we enforce SSL on Wikipedia for everyone,
Wikipedia is much more restricted in some countries, such as China,
where it's entirely blocked (I think only SSL is blocked, but users
now have no option to fall back to non-ssl version).
Is there some non-ssl mirror for people in
Also, mobile phones would probably benefit from this most, if there is
some wiki-reader app that uses API for it to work.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created this ticket: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119878
>
Hi,
I created this ticket: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119878
The basic idea is that it shouldn't be a big problem to compress
output of api.php script using some widely available library, like
gzip.
That way the size of communication between client and server would be
much smaller and
Interesting. I was googling for something like that, but for whatever
reasons it just wasn't anywhere in the results...
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
<bjor...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
&g
Hi,
>>
>> On 11/10/2015 09:06 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>> > Perhaps it would worth merging and putting to some central location?
>>
>> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I typically recommend
>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Wctaiwan/Gerrit_cheatsheet>
Hello,
I would like to remind that I made this guide some time ago:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Petrb/Git_for_idiots
It always quite sucked and still does, but I tried to slightly rewrite
it now, so it should contain more accurate information.
I would like to keep it as a super simple
Now I also found this awesome guide:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Aude/Git
Perhaps it would worth merging and putting to some central location?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remind that I made this guid
Do you really want to say that reading from disk is faster than
processing the text using CPU? I don't know how complex syntax of mw
actually is, but C++ compilers are probably much faster than parsoid,
if that's true. And these are very slow.
What takes so much CPU time in turning wikitext into
or debian, no proprietary software, hard-to-get public IP, long
waiting time for stuff that you can't do yourself (request new
project), no IPv6 and many others)
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Petr Bena <benap.
Hi,
Why do you even care? Is this question directed to foundation only or
community developers as well? "Used by wikimedia" is very broad term.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
>
>> Is AWS (Amazon Web Services) being used by Wikimedia directly; US
>>
Sorry, I mentioned the question for OP of this thread.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
>
>> Why do you even care? Is this question directed to foundation only or
>> community developers as well? "Used by wikimedia" is very broad term.
>
> I interpreted
Hello,
I would like to get your input for this potential Google-Code /
Outreachy task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114631
Quick summary: Right now there is no simple way to detect syntax
errors of a wikicode (text user input as a source code for wiki page).
Its existence would make it
yay, that fixed the problem, thanks :o
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
<bjor...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just to make clear what my problem is, here is example. There is a
That "compare" feature look promising. Thanks
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
<bjor...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I suppose in that case I would set RevID to 520
se changes.
Why is that? I would like to see a diff of these 3 edits from
681167574 which is oldest to 681167909 which in time of me writing
this was last revision.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That "compare" feature look promising. Th
Is there going to be a hangout stream for the presentations so that
people who can't attend (trip is just too expensive) can see or
participate at them?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> You have probably read the announcement of the Wikimedia Developer
I am trying to understand how this works:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Revisions
There is a parameter DiffTo which says: Revision ID to diff each
revision to. Use "prev", "next" and "cur" for the previous, next and
current revision respectively.
I suppose that I can give it revision ID
it might be a little redundant.
On a related note, we've been trying to add the Easy tag where
appropriate.
--stephen
[0] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104086
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Petr Bena benap
Force pushes can be disabled if you contact github support
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Good job, you aren't the only one. Huggle team is using it for quite
some time
Good job, you aren't the only one. Huggle team is using it for quite
some time. To be honest I still feel that github is far superior to
our gerrit installation and don't really understand why we don't use
it for other projects too.
The GitHub's pull requests are more compliant with original git
Asking of stackoverflow to resolve a phabricator task is same as
asking there to do your homework.
How is CSS not common amongst MediaWiki, did something change recently? :P
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Petr Bena benap
Hi,
What if we added extra projects to phabricator for programming
languages (such as language-php, language-c) which could be optionally
added to some tickets if help of people who know these languages would
be needed. So that it would be possible for example to c++ experts to
filter out open
:
You can already infer some languages from the project: Pywikibot → Python,
Hierator → Java etc.
And nearly any other one will have language-php then. But for C++ it might
still make sense.
Il 17/07/2015 10:04, Petr Bena ha scritto:
Hi,
What if we added extra projects to phabricator
Yes it was, labs still didn't recover from the outage:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T103696?workflow=103265
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Stephen Niedzielski
sniedziel...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This seems to have stopped working a few days ago. I get a 502 Bad
Gateway. I was thinking it
There is no such a thing like properly break. That's like if someone
was happily sad. Come on
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Yuri Astrakhan yastrak...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:44 PM,
Hi,
Krinkle wanted to use BotBot.me log viewer as a frontend for wm-bot's
logs. It unfortunatelly uses slightly different database schemas, but
I managed to create some views in wm-bot's db that actually produces
similar columns and behold! It works:
http://botbot.wmflabs.org/freenode/15/
Well,
I fixed slugs now, so every channel has perma links in format of
http://botbot.wmflabs.org/freenode/CHANNEL for example
http://botbot.wmflabs.org/freenode/wikimedia-labs/
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Krinkle wanted to use BotBot.me log viewer
\O/ MORE HACKATHONS per year! yay
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dan Bolser dan.bol...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong list, please feel free to distribute as
appropriate...
Details (developing) here:
Out of curiosity, this may also break all versions of huggle that are
older than 3.15, which was released sometime around November 2014.
I strongly recommend you to upgrade if you are using such an ancient
version. I don't know what is going to happen, but it may break.
Unless someone patches the
* 3.1.5 not 3.15, sorry for confusion :P
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, this may also break all versions of huggle that are
older than 3.15, which was released sometime around November 2014.
I strongly recommend you to upgrade if you
Hi,
I will be migrating wm-bot's database server to new box running
postgres today. It shouldn't harm any log collection in channels where
logging is enabled, but it will make it impossible to use the SQL
based viewer at http://tools.wmflabs.org/wm-bot/logs for a while (I
hope just few hours).
Hi,
I was looking at pages on wiki and couldn't find where to submit
proposals for presentations or cons that would take place on Lyon's
hackathon, so I will post it here.
I don't know how many people who do or have done some antivandalism
(see [[w:WP:VAND|Vandalism]] for info) work in any way
One foundation to rule them all? :P
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, just a quick note: as part of general search and discovery work, me and
Yuri are resurrecting the project to have OpenStreetMap in Wikimedia
starting in April. Because the initial
Ok, here I copy my message
Petrb (talkcontribsblock)
Hi,
I think you all missed some old good rants. So here is one :) why the
hell is the URL Topic:Sdoatsbslsafx6lw and not something easy to read
and remember?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I randomly opened RecentChanges page on enwiki and this is what I saw:
http://img.ctrlv.in/img/15/03/06/54f9d5645eb03.png from 50 edits, at
least 8 were automated, just as much interesting as any regular bot
edit.
It usually is even worse, anyway as you can
I randomly opened RecentChanges page on enwiki and this is what I saw:
http://img.ctrlv.in/img/15/03/06/54f9d5645eb03.png from 50 edits, at
least 8 were automated, just as much interesting as any regular bot
edit.
It usually is even worse, anyway as you can see about 20% of all edits
you can see
I have a question regarding scholarship: is there a way to indicate
that I would like to apply for a full scholarship, but in case the
application wouldn't pass, I am also interested in partial
scholarship?
Partial scholarship is still better than none, in which case I might
not be able to attend
Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de a
écrit :
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I know I asked about this thing recently, but I can't remember
what the outcome was.
I know it's currently not possible to create cross wiki templates
Hi,
Sorry, I know I asked about this thing recently, but I can't remember
what the outcome was.
I know it's currently not possible to create cross wiki templates, but
is there any plan to implement this feature? For example pages like
http://enwp.org/Linux contains Latest version and probably
I don't believe that users would actually use it if this permission
was so hard to obtain as bot flag is (on english wiki). If there was
such a huge complex bureaucratic process for this, most of users would
just keep doing semi-automated edits as regular edits. The summary of
differences between
I don't really see what is a problem here. On meta you can request
deletion of all userpages in 2 minutes, I myself got my userpages
deleted within 2 days and I didn't have to care at all. It was super
simple and it worked.
I've seen a lot of problematic deployments of things that didn't work,
Hi,
Long time ago I purchased domain cswp.cz in order to use it in same
way as enwp.org for czech wikipedia (cswp.org was taken by something).
I think that it would be probably better if it was owned and
maintained by WMF rather than me, but I don't really know where to
ask, neither if ops are
Now maybe create some user friendly documentation less technical than
what is on extension-desc which tell users how to use this?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:30 AM, florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de
florian.schmidt.wel...@t-online.de wrote:
Yeah, thanks for your work on this Kunal!
enwiki:
Is there any limit for a number of buddies? I suppose that one WMF
employee can have more than 1 non-WMF buddy, otherwise the limit of
non-WMF people at hackathon would equal number of employees :P
P.S. I no have a buddy :'( no one lieks me
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Quim Gil
by default?)
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain the point of these lines to me?
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/includes/Html.php#L269
Someone thought
/r/191473/ for consistency with
closeElement.
Thanks for reporting.
Il 18/02/2015 22:38, Petr Bena ha scritto:
I was digging and I found that commit you sent - eefe1b13a but you can
see that this commit modified 2 functions: both open and closeElement,
however for some reason the code
fix the broken html before it
gets printed out
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's the other way, omiting the html tags is probably correct,
as long as both opening and ending tags are omitted :P so I think the
closeElement function needs a fix
Most of browsers would probably handle it OK, but validators not.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep
That makes me feel like this is bug which everyone overlooked because
it's true by default. If you set it to false mediawiki would likely
write out
Yep
That makes me feel like this is bug which everyone overlooked because
it's true by default. If you set it to false mediawiki would likely
write out syntactically wrong code.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Petr Bena
-bot.wmflabs.org/github/index.php
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I forgot few things:
The bot used to be available to everyone, but freenode staff requested
me to limit it only for wikimedia people, so that there aren't people
who abuse it. For that reason in order
in
#wm-bot and someone will help you out.
Also, these @github+ / @github- commands need to be issued in YOUR
channel, not #wm-bot
Thanks :)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I was too tired of semi-working unstable random IRC services that
provides
As half of wikimedia labs just died, rendering this feature unusable,
I am taking back teh Pretty stable feature :/
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
It wouldn't be me if I didn't forget how the whole thing works 5
minutes after I finish it. So yes, I forgot
/87ad2018cae6...f5b2131c10ad
(10:41:00) wm-bot GitHub [benapetr/test-wm] commit by benapetr
(Petr Bena)
https://github.com/benapetr/test-wm/commit/f5b2131c10ad3bb1fe902db911ed01421ce6effe
test
Formatting kind of suck, but you can fix it! Handler is written in
PHP:
https://github.com/benapetr
I think it's pretty clear what I am proposing here :P there is a real
problem and this is a real solution. Regarding vandals would have fun
with that I think you are over estimating them, most of them are
barely able to use regular web based interface for anything more
clever than removing half of
What would be the letter for it then? s? t? a?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I think bot edits are most closely aligned with fully automated editing.
Perhaps semi-automated edit would work.
Pine
On Feb 12, 2015 10:34 AM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
Hi
Some of you who use JS and Python were probably excited about
deployment of new RCStream (1) and some of you who use .Net were
probably disapointed how complex it is to get it, JSON and
websockets.IO running on .Net in order to get it working.
Here I made a super simple C# library that
I like that volunteer flag, please keep it.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in
Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than
expected. I am sorry for that -
this have to do with English Wikipedia ? It is useful
everywhere.. Why limit the scope ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 February 2015 at 10:33, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the question is however, if this passed consensus on english
wikipedia and I made a patch for mediawiki, assuming code
/Manual:$wgEnableScaryTranscluding.
See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T52329 for a Wikimedia implementation
instead.
Il 12/02/2015 13:32, Petr Bena ha scritto:
Hi,
Is it possible to use template from english wikipedia on a different
wiki (meta in this case)? Something like {{w:Template
OK Thanks
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to use template from english wikipedia on a different
wiki (meta in this case)? Something like {{w:Template}}.
Not possible
Hi,
Is it possible to use template from english wikipedia on a different
wiki (meta in this case)? Something like {{w:Template}}.
I couldn't find this anywhere. I don't want to export it, I want to be
able to change it on 1 wiki so that change gets everywhere else as
well.
Regarding everyone loves JSON these days:
I truly, deeply, hate it.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I'd to modestly propose that we talk about managing/announcing breaking
changes to core MediaWiki architecture.
I want to have this
...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hello,
Le mercredi 11 février 2015, 16:59:45 Petr Bena a écrit :
We have OAuth for browser based programs. But nothing for desktop
applications that are being used by users. (Like AWB etc).
It sounds pretty simple to me, so why we don't have anything like
I know this and that is why I started this thread :)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Guillaume Paumier
gpaum...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello,
Le mercredi 11 février 2015, 16:59:45 Petr Bena a écrit :
We have OAuth for browser based programs. But nothing for desktop
applications
Hi,
We have OAuth for browser based programs. But nothing for desktop
applications that are being used by users. (Like AWB etc).
These applications now have to ask for password, which is kind of safe
given that they are open source and running on computer of the user,
so at some point giving
Feb 2015 17:57, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I belive that any registered user should be able to use,
with no need for permissions as I see no way to abuse it.
If anyone can use it, wouldn't the smarter vandals just use it to avoid
the
RC patrollers?
How does a user
in message
news:caf_zkbp-abgzgcy4lqqvbtxur-2tjo8opmbwxtrosfvihuc...@mail.gmail.com...
On 11 Feb 2015 17:57, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I belive that any registered user should be able to use,
with no need for permissions as I see no way to abuse it.
If anyone can use
.
Then you could advertise it on enwiki and other major wikis.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I belive that any registered user should be able to use,
with no need for permissions as I see no way to abuse it.
Well, there's marking edits as tool
be useful for other wikis as well. We
already have bot flag and most of smaller wikis have no bots.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely worth discussing. For ENWP, I suggest bringing this up on VP:T.
Thanks,
Pine
On Feb 11, 2015 12:45 AM, Petr Bena benap
:
Definitely worth discussing. For ENWP, I suggest bringing this up on VP:T.
Thanks,
Pine
On Feb 11, 2015 12:45 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think I proposed this once but I forgot the outcome.
I would like to implement a new feature called tool edit it would be
pretty much
Hi,
I think I proposed this once but I forgot the outcome.
I would like to implement a new feature called tool edit it would be
pretty much the same as bot edit but with following differences:
-- Every registered user would be able to flag edit as tool edit (bot
needs special user group)
-- The
, I can easily do
that on linux and compile with mingw compiler that can build .exe
files on linux. But in case of apple you can only dream of that.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Le 08/02/2015 15:26, Petr Bena a écrit :
What can I say, I always had
permissions from other developers who contributed
the code in order to change the license.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
TBH as open source developer I don't feel like publishing kernel
sources makes it any easier for me to create applications for their
platform
1 - 100 of 634 matches
Mail list logo