On 2/7/2013 12:24 AM, Chad wrote:
I think that this is a solution in search
of a problem.
How about saying, extensions on mw.org shouldn't expose security
vulnerabilities to wiki's running them. That would probably be a better
metric.
___
On 3/20/2012 11:35 PM, Diederik van Liere wrote:
Yes, ScientiaMobile has made some very important changes to the
license and it does mean (AFAIK) that you cannot store the wurfl.xml
in a repository.
ScientiaMobile basically took an open data repository and closed it, the
complete opposite of
On 6/15/2011 4:02 PM, Chad wrote:
Hi everyone,
Painstakingly, all of the unit tests are now passing on cruise control
(Sqlite)
and my local install (Sqlite Mysql). This is as of r90150 [0]. Thank you
immensely to Brion for finally tracking down and eliminating that pesky
BlockTest bug.
On 2/15/2011 11:34 AM, Anthony Ventresque (Dr) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Anthony Ventresque (Dr)
aventres...@ntu.edu.sg wrote:
I was indeed suspecting something like that, but the difference in number
of pages is large while we are talking about a relatively short delay
On 11/25/2010 2:14 AM, Petromir Dzhunev wrote:
Hi everyone,
Would you like to put in page table coordinates for each page(of course
for the pages, which have coordinates)?Is it possible?
The reason I'm asking you is that we want to know, which Wikipedia pages are
marked in Google
On 10/17/2010 7:54 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
If you understand the issue, you would know who decides what qualifies as
vandalism. It is exactly the same people who already decide what vandalism
is.
So basically you want anybody who visits the website to be able to tell
google to
On 10/10/2010 2:26 AM, Benjamin Lees wrote:
Looking at the deletion logs, it appears the extra scariness might
have had a small effect on the rate of test page creations, but even
if so, I'm not sure it's worth the cost.
I guess I'm just confused on what this 'cost' supposedly is?
On 10/10/2010 2:38 AM, Andrew Garrett wrote:
Burned eyeballs and users scared away by some big ugly red hand. See
Commons for big stop signs gone mad.
And what users exactly are we worried about scaring away from mw.org wiki?
___
Wikitech-l mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 9/3/2010 10:59 PM, Trevor Parscal wrote:
- Trevor (and Roan, who's committing the merge to SVN right now)
Pssst, it's broken.
- --
var src=mediaWiki.config.get('server')+'/load.php
- --
Hurm, what's server?
mediaWiki.config.get('server')
On 7/2/2010 3:46 AM, Tei wrote:
On 1 July 2010 21:58, OQ overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Christopher Grant
chrisgrantm...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Henri Salo he...@nerv.fi
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:36:40 +0300
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/24/2010 6:42 PM, church.of.emacs.ml wrote:
Hi,
On 05/24/2010 04:44 PM, Peter17 wrote:
It is now open for comments, so, could you please read it and let me
know about your remarks and suggestions, on this list and/or on the
talk page?
again,
Illes
If you're referring to what rights a group is assigned, then no, there
isn't a historical record. The only way, afaik, is possibly digging
through the wikitech admin log and bugzilla and trying to piece it together.
- -Q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32
On 3/24/2010 6:13 PM, Makelesi Kora-Gonelevu wrote:
Hi sorry here it is:
!-- No [view source] tab for anonymous users --
?php global $wgUser; if( $wgUser-isAnon() ) { ?
style
#ca-viewsource { display: none !important; }
/style
?php } ?
[[MediaWiki:Common.css]] is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/3/2010 12:36 AM, Marco Schuster wrote:
With Wordpress upgrades it's even easier: two clicks and you're done
(okay, except if you run multi-user WP setups). Same for extension
updates. It even *notifies* you for updates, especially for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/19/2010 4:42 AM, Alex Brollo wrote:
Hi all, I'm new into the list. Please be patient if my questions are not soo
deep or have been discussed previously (I'm mainly a it.wikisourcian).
1. As I see, .png images from math tag have a white
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/18/2010 5:30 AM, Robert Ullmann wrote:
Hi,
There is a note here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ParserFunctions saying you
should use a different version of ParserFunctions for 1.15.1. I'm not
at all sure what that actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chad wrote:
Forwarding to wikitech-l, for anyone who's not on the other list.
Yay!
-Chad
From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM
Subject: [Foundation-l] Announcement: Priyanka Dhanda joins Wikimedia
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Martin Peeks wrote:
Sadly while both myself and Sean have access to the stable server and
hence the code, both of us lack the knowledge and ability to fix it.
I should clarify, the code is no longer on the toolserver for some reason.
Stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ryan Chan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
jcsahnwa...@gmail.com wrote:
With the indexes defined in tables.sql, query performance
is ok. For example, selecting the titles of all articles that
are not redirects
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ryan Chan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
MediaWiki has used MySQL since the beginning and has let the code get
away with things that shouldn't have been done which makes switching to
Postgres hard.
Isn't
wouldn't worry too much about it :)
- -Q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEAREIAAYFAkrZzVMACgkQ69PBoSWyJd6U3gCfQFsmn/QjI7bGzlgJEwBNH1jc
ET4AniY4TGT/PNzGPw5prklnGM1zfa2G
=UDyK
-END PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Well thankfully the majority of 3rd party users have a better feeling
about reporting bugs when they find them.
I'm not sure where you got the statistics
22 matches
Mail list logo
