FYI, Lila had chosen to engage in discussion on her meta talk page.
Numerous editors are commenting there. Discussion also continues on the
meta RFC and on the English Wikipedia arbitration workshop page.
Pine
On Aug 14, 2014 12:03 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik
On Thu,
Admins are currently given broad leeway to customize the user
experience for all users, including addition of site-wide JS, CSS,
etc. These are important capabilities of the wiki that have been
used for many clearly beneficial purposes. In the long run, we will
want to apply a code review
On 8/10/14, 6:27 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
Hi folks,
Admins are currently given broad leeway to customize the user
experience for all users, including addition of site-wide JS, CSS,
etc. These are important capabilities of the wiki that have been
used for many clearly beneficial purposes.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before this, there was no expectation that a page could be protected
such that sysops could not alter the content of the superprotected
page.
This is false.
Now, the devs/ops have attempted to introduce that
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before this, there was no expectation that a page could be protected
such that sysops could not alter the content of the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:54 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Was this functionality was ever supported by MediaWiki core?
Of course this is supported by MediaWiki core, although I cannot attest as
to whether it was previously implemented on WMF wikis.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
