Thanks, but I'm looking for something that is more specific to MediaWiki
and that commits development teams to specific, standardized, and
transparently measured quality metrics as products advance or regress in
their path to production release.
Pine
Given longtime experience with problematic releases of MediaWiki features,
I think that published quality standards that products must meet in order
to become production releases could help to limit the number and
seriousness of additional troubled launches. These standards would also
reduce the
Just a few thoughts:
* I agree that the tone of the email that started this discussion about
software quality standards was unnecessarily critical. Even in production
releases, users may find occasional bugs.
* The intent of HHVM implementation and James' quick response to the
problem report are
Do we have a published guideline somewhere about MediaWiki quality
standards for pre-alpha, alpha, beta, and production releases of elements
like MediaViewer, VisualEditor, Flow, Winter, and HHVM?
Pine
On Sep 20, 2014 12:14 AM, Jon Work jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
:} I am always
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Rand McRanderson therands...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one idea. A dashboard of top level Wikimedia projects with
statuses, estimates, and a key to terms. Or does this exist?
There is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering/Dashboard
It
