Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Roan Kattouw
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Platonides wrote: > On 05/04/12 20:23, Roan Kattouw wrote: > > This only happens if you click "Publish and Submit", which means "publish > > my comments and attempt to merge the commit". This fails because there is > > no Verified +1 review, so the commit doesn't

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Platonides
On 05/04/12 20:23, Roan Kattouw wrote: > This only happens if you click "Publish and Submit", which means "publish > my comments and attempt to merge the commit". This fails because there is > no Verified +1 review, so the commit doesn't satisfy the criteria for > merging. If you click "Publish com

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Roan Kattouw
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Platonides wrote: > If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification > status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: > > Application Error > > Server Error > > Requires Verified > > I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Chad
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Platonides wrote: > If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification > status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: >> Application Error >> Server Error >> Requires Verified > > I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but, can

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Platonides
If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: > Application Error > Server Error > Requires Verified I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but, can we get rid of it? We don't want changesets dummily marked as

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Roan Kattouw
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Happy Melon wrote: > So basically, in Gerrit, (1 + 1 != 2)...?? :-) > > ...and that's exactly why I said that "+2" is a confusingly named concept in my previous message. Roan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Happy Melon
On 5 April 2012 11:43, Antoine Musso wrote: > Le 04/04/12 22:56, Roan Kattouw a écrit : > > >> What that means, is that a change could look fine (Verified + CR) and > >> thus be merged by accident if someone with the correct right click the > >> 'Submit Patch Set 1' button :-D > >> > >> No, that

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-05 Thread Antoine Musso
Le 04/04/12 22:56, Roan Kattouw a écrit : >> What that means, is that a change could look fine (Verified + CR) and >> thus be merged by accident if someone with the correct right click the >> 'Submit Patch Set 1' button :-D >> >> No, that's not true. A change requires Code Review +2 before it can

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-04 Thread Roan Kattouw
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Antoine Musso wrote: > Dear Gerrit users, > > Gerrit let us flag changes with two fields: > > - Code Review > - Verified > > Anyone is allowed to +1/-1 the Code Review field but only a few people > are allowed to mark a change as Verified. > I have bring back Je

[Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

2012-04-04 Thread Antoine Musso
Dear Gerrit users, Gerrit let us flag changes with two fields: - Code Review - Verified Anyone is allowed to +1/-1 the Code Review field but only a few people are allowed to mark a change as Verified. I have bring back Jenkins in action and it is now running tests for us, whenever a test suite