Jackmcbarn wrote:
I agree with pretty much all of this. In my mind, editcontentmodel is a
temporary hack that should go away completely once the bugs that led to
its creation are fixed.
This is now being discussed at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92794.
MZMcBride
I agree with pretty much all of this. In my mind, editcontentmodel is a
temporary hack that should go away completely once the bugs that led to its
creation are fixed.
Jackmcbarn
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 01/09/2015 04:25 PM, Erik
On Jan 23, 2015 8:43 PM, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 01/22/2015 10:00 PM, Legoktm wrote:
I disagree that we need a editcontentmodel user right. I think all
users should be allowed to change the content model of a page (provided
they have the right to edit it, etc.).
On 01/24/2015 07:52 AM, Chris Steipp wrote:
From a security perspective, I like limiting the content models per
namespace to a relatively small whitelist. I think it will give more
flexibility to anyone coming up with new content type definitions if we
don't have to worry about what happen if
On 01/22/2015 10:00 PM, Legoktm wrote:
I disagree that we need a editcontentmodel user right. I think all
users should be allowed to change the content model of a page (provided
they have the right to edit it, etc.).
I think that setting a content model different from the namespace's
default
Hi,
On 01/09/2015 04:25 PM, Erik Bernhardson wrote:
However, changing the content model of an existing page is a disruptive
change. We added the right `editcontentmodel` without which attempts to
change content model through the API or EditPage.php fail. Currently no
group (user or bot) has
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Erik Bernhardson ebernhard...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
The Co-op team will ask the Bot Approval Group on enwiki to grant their
bot this right.
*enwiki BAG hat on*
FYI, they'll be asked to advertise the request on enwiki [[WP:VPR]], and
probably [[WP:AN]] wouldn't
When ContentHandler support was added to MediaWiki in 2012, the content
type and content model of a revision is stored with it. However, the DB
tables for WMF wikis did not have the new columns, so
$wgContentHandlerUseDB was set to false on our wikis.
Eventually the database jobs to add and
