On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
> Hmmm... we could use a new rc request variable.
> Rather than this &oldrc= &newrc= &cleanrc= stuff we should switch to
> something like just &rctype={classic,enhanced,clean}.
>
URL parameters are kind of ugly for this.
-Chad
_
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Happy Melon wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 22:38, Daniel Friesen >wrote:
>
> > On 11-09-27 02:18 PM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
> > >>> * File path
> > >> Special:Filepath is an important special page for linking. If you have
> > >> uploads then Special:Filepath is the
On 11-09-27 05:58 PM, Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
>> On 11-09-27 02:18 PM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
>>> Woah woah woah, I definitely didn't (and would never) say you would'nt
>>> have these things in your wiki, or that mediawiki shouldn't ship with
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Currently there are two Recent changes
> On 11-09-27 02:18 PM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
>> Woah woah woah, I definitely didn't (and would never) say you would'nt
>> have these things in your wiki, or that mediawiki shouldn't ship with
>> them.
>>
>> Currently there are two Recent changes in core, and a few extensions
>> that have alternati
On 27 September 2011 22:38, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> On 11-09-27 02:18 PM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
> >>> * File path
> >> Special:Filepath is an important special page for linking. If you have
> >> uploads then Special:Filepath is the only way for bots and other 3rd
> >> party tools to reliably get a
On 11-09-27 02:18 PM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
> Woah woah woah, I definitely didn't (and would never) say you would'nt
> have these things in your wiki, or that mediawiki shouldn't ship with
> them.
>
> Currently there are two Recent changes in core, and a few extensions
> that have alternatives as w
Woah woah woah, I definitely didn't (and would never) say you would'nt
have these things in your wiki, or that mediawiki shouldn't ship with
them.
Currently there are two Recent changes in core, and a few extensions
that have alternatives as well. I don't see why some are extensions
and some are c
On 11-09-27 06:37 AM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
> * Recent changes
This is as ridiculous as removing diffs completely. Revisions, the
ability to diff between them, and a list of changes are three key core
features. If you're going to get rid of any of them you might as well
just stop using MediaWiki.
Olivier Beaton wrote:
> Thing's I'd like to see in extensions and shipped with the default
> install (maybe not each item in it's own, a lot of these could be
> grouped)
I think you're being too bold here (eg. Special:Statistics but keeping
the statistics core). Although I agree that most of thos
Thing's I'd like to see in extensions and shipped with the default
install (maybe not each item in it's own, a lot of these could be
grouped)
Maintenance reports
* Broken redirects
* Dead-end pages
* Double redirects
* Long pages
* Oldest pages
* Orphaned pages
* Pages with the fewest revisions
*
On 11-09-26 03:09 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Happy Melon
> wrote:
>
>>> LanguageConverter would be a bitch to move out only because there are
>> precious few people who could tell us how it's *supposed* to work, let
>> alone
>> whether it still works after we change
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Happy Melon wrote:
> > LanguageConverter would be a bitch to move out only because there are
> precious few people who could tell us how it's *supposed* to work, let
> alone
> whether it still works after we change anything in it. But LC doesn't
> AFAIK
> form any
On 26 September 2011 21:50, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Olivier Beaton >wrote:
>
> Things like LanguageConverter have been in MediaWiki for several years and
> date to younger times for the extension interface. Math wasn't broken out
> into an extension until 1.18 beca
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Olivier Beaton wrote:
> I've started a Request for comment on MW for the decorification of MW
> features into extensions. I am not talking about removing features that we
> distribute to our users. Simply how we include them in the mediawiki
> software (core vs ext
I've started a Request for comment on MW for the decorification of MW
features into extensions. I am not talking about removing features that we
distribute to our users. Simply how we include them in the mediawiki
software (core vs extensions) especially now that our new installer allows
us to pack
15 matches
Mail list logo
