Brion Vibber wrote:
I believe that refers to yesterday's replication lag on the machine
running watchlist queries; the abstract dump process that was hitting
that particular server was aborted yesterday.
Is Yahoo still using those? Looking at the last successful one for
enwiki, it looks
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.dewrote:
Now, to be even more useful, database dumps should be produced on
*regular* intervals. That way, we can compare various measures
such as article growth, link counts or usage of certain words,
without having to
Brion Vibber schrieb:
On a related note: I noticed that the meta-info dumps like
stub-meta-history.xml.gz etc appear to be generated from the full
history dump -
and thus fail if the full history dump fails, and get delayed if the
full
history dump gets delayed.
Quite the opposite;
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
In my opinion fragmentation of conversations onto evermore mailing lists
discourages contribution.
I have to agree that I don't think the dump discussion traffic seemed
large enough to warrant a whole new mailing list.
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
In my opinion fragmentation of conversations onto evermore mailing lists
discourages contribution.
I have to agree that I don't think the dump discussion traffic seemed
large enough to warrant a
In my opinion fragmentation of conversations onto evermore mailing lists
discourages contribution.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Andreas Meier wrote:
Tomasz Finc schrieb:
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Russell Blau wrote:
Erik Zachte
Andreas Meier wrote:
Tomasz Finc schrieb:
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Russell Blau wrote:
Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote in message
news:002d01c9cd8d$3355beb0$9a013c...@com...
Tomasz, the amount of dump power that you managed to activate is
impressive.
136 dumps yesterday, today
Tomasz Finc schrieb:
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Russell Blau wrote:
Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote in message
news:002d01c9cd8d$3355beb0$9a013c...@com...
Tomasz, the amount of dump power that you managed to activate is
impressive.
136 dumps yesterday, today already 110 :-) Out of 760
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Commons finished just fine along with every single one of the
other small mid size wiki's waiting to be picked up. Now were
just left with the big sized wiki's to finish.
The new dump processes started on May 1 and sped up to twelve
processes on May 4. As of yesterday
Lars wrote
Now, to be even more useful, database dumps should be produced on
*regular* intervals. That way, we can compare various measures
such as article growth, link counts or usage of certain words,
without having to introduce the exact dump time in the count.
That would complicate
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Russell Blau wrote:
Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote in message
news:002d01c9cd8d$3355beb0$9a013c...@com...
Tomasz, the amount of dump power that you managed to activate is
impressive.
136 dumps yesterday, today already 110 :-) Out of 760 total.
Of course
Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote in message
news:4a032be3.60...@wikimedia.org...
Commons finished just fine along with every single one of the other
small mid size wiki's waiting to be picked up. Now were just left with
the big sized wiki's to finish.
This is probably a stupid
Tomasz, the amount of dump power that you managed to activate is impressive.
136 dumps yesterday, today already 110 :-) Out of 760 total.
Of course there are small en large dumps, but this is very encouraging.
Erik Zachte
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
