2012/2/16 Thomas Gries
> Hi,
>
> the template https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Extension for the
> Extension infobox shows "Author(s)".
> Shouldn't we also have "Maintainer(s)" as a parameter ?
>
Why not both?
Author should appear for each extension, and maintainer as necessary.
--
Bin
I could see value in recording the original author and allowing that to be
replaced with the current maintainer (maybe past maintainers as well) to
prevent a long list of inactive users appearing in the infobox. Inactive
maintainers may also appreciate still receiving credit for their work with
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Thomas Gries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the template https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Extension for the
> Extension infobox shows "Author(s)".
> Shouldn't we also have "Maintainer(s)" as a parameter ?
>
If you're maintaining it, couldn't you just add yourself to the
Hi,
the template https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Extension for the
Extension infobox shows "Author(s)".
Shouldn't we also have "Maintainer(s)" as a parameter ?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
