On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 11:47 -0800, Gergo Tisza wrote:
It could be more interesting, although probably on the team level rather
than globally, is the number of open tasks for a given priority. If, for
example, the number of tasks with normal priority is growing continuously,
that does signal
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Nuria Ruiz nu...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests
(long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some
growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is
Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests
(long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some
growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is
saying)
Much agreed. Phabricator is used to keep track of many other things
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 00:39 -0800, Pine W wrote:
It would be interesting to compare our trends to those of other open source
projects with open bug or task trackers.
For trends in other FOSS projects, see data I posted in
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78639#936184
On Feb 1, 2015 7:47
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Number of active users (any activity) in (2015-01): 669
Number of task authors in (2015-01): 401
Number of users who have closed tasks in (2015-01):
When comparing to Bugzilla rather than bugs open/closed engagement would be
a good measure of success e.g. number of replies.
I sense more involvement from community members with the LDAP integration
since the move which IMO is huge.
I personally am creating more bugs there as Phabricator is a
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Number of active users (any activity) in (2015-01): 669
Number of task authors in (2015-01): 401
Number of users who have closed tasks in (2015-01): 199
How does that compare to the last months of Bugzilla?
Also, if there is
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
For Bugzilla we had http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/its.html and
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/bugzilla_response_time.html but now we
miss graphs
It would be interesting to compare our trends to those of other open source
projects with open bug or task trackers.
Pine
On Feb 1, 2015 7:47 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 1 February 2015 at 14:16, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix the
gap, yes?
Thanks,
Pine
On Feb 1, 2015 11:49 AM, Quim Gil
-- Forwarded message --
From: communitymetr...@wikimedia.org
Date: Feb 1, 2015 1:00 AM
Subject: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01
To: communitymetr...@wikimedia.org
Cc:
Hi Community Metrics team,
this is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail.
Number of
On 1 February 2015 at 14:16, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix
Just a note to say that on January 1 a first Phabricator monthly statistics
report was generated. If you want to improve it, suggestions are welcome at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1003 or in a new task.
Now we need a way to store and visualize this data, a topic that is being
discussed at
Quim Gil wrote:
Just a note to say that on January 1 a first Phabricator monthly
statistics report was generated. If you want to improve it, suggestions
are welcome at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1003 or in a new task.
This task talks about sending the monthly report to this list
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:03 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
This task talks about sending the monthly report to this list
(wikitech-l), which would be similar to the weekly Bugzilla reports that
were previously sent to wikitech-l. However, this first report seems to
have been sent to
Hoi,
I understand that Phabricator is the place to be. My user for phabricator
thinks I use an old WMF profile. Can someone please change this to this
email address for me?
As it is I am stuck. I cannot change it.
Thanks,
GerardM
___
Wikitech-l
Have you looked at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/email/
? You can add additional email addresses to your account there, and change
which one is primary.
--
Bartosz Dziewoński
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Hoi,
This is the text I get .Obviously I cannot do this because I do not have
access to that account any more
You must verify your email address to login. You should have a new email
message from Phabricator with verification instructions in your inbox
(*gmeijs...@wikimedia.org
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
I understand that Phabricator is the place to be. My user for phabricator
thinks I use an old WMF profile. Can someone please change this to this
email address for me?
Hi Gerard, I thought you had
This discussion might better suited for
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Help than wikitech-l@...
Hi,
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 13:09 +0200, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Obviously I cannot do this because I do not have
access to that account any more
Not sure if I understand the problem
Hoi,
My SUL profile has gerard.meijs...@gmail.com, my bugzilla is based on
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com and I want to KEEP my own bugs.
When I click on Prabricator in Bugzilla it goes haywire because it
expects gmeijs...@wikimedia.org.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 October 2014 01:05, Andre Klapper
22 matches
Mail list logo
