On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 11:47 -0800, Gergo Tisza wrote:
> It could be more interesting, although probably on the team level rather
> than globally, is the number of open tasks for a given priority. If, for
> example, the number of tasks with normal priority is growing continuously,
> that does signal
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote:
> >Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests
> >(long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some
> >growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is
> >saying)
> Much agr
>Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests
>(long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some
>growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is
>saying)
Much agreed. Phabricator is used to keep track of many other things be
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 00:39 -0800, Pine W wrote:
> It would be interesting to compare our trends to those of other open source
> projects with open bug or task trackers.
For trends in other FOSS projects, see data I posted in
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78639#936184
> On Feb 1, 2015 7:47
When comparing to Bugzilla rather than bugs open/closed engagement would be
a good measure of success e.g. number of replies.
I sense more involvement from community members with the LDAP integration
since the move which IMO is huge.
I personally am creating more bugs there as Phabricator is a to
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
>
> > Number of active users (any activity) in (2015-01): 669
> > Number of task authors in (2015-01): 401
> > Number of users who have closed tasks in (2015-01): 199
> >
>
> How does that comp
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> Number of active users (any activity) in (2015-01): 669
> Number of task authors in (2015-01): 401
> Number of users who have closed tasks in (2015-01): 199
>
How does that compare to the last months of Bugzilla?
Also, if there is an easy way to
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Pine W wrote:
> Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
>
For Bugzilla we had http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/its.html and
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/bugzilla_response_time.html but now we
miss graphs for Maniphest (see
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Pine W wrote:
> Hi Quim,
>
> Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
> There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
> normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix the
> gap, yes
It would be interesting to compare our trends to those of other open source
projects with open bug or task trackers.
Pine
On Feb 1, 2015 7:47 PM, "James Forrester" wrote:
> On 1 February 2015 at 14:16, Pine W wrote:
>
> > Hi Quim,
> >
> > Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere tha
On 1 February 2015 at 14:16, Pine W wrote:
> Hi Quim,
>
> Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
> There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
> normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix the
> gap, yes?
>
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends?
There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's
normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix the
gap, yes?
Thanks,
Pine
On Feb 1, 2015 11:49 AM, "Quim Gil" wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Feb 1, 2015 1:00 AM
Subject: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01
To:
Cc:
Hi Community Metrics team,
this is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail.
Number of accounts created in (2015-01): 305
Number of active users (any act
13 matches
Mail list logo
