the reason to use two fields instead of one makes it much easier to
implement or performant?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:08 AM, David Schoonover wrote:
> Huh! News to me as well. I definitely agree with that decision. Thanks, Ori!
>
> I've already written the Varnish code for setting X-MF-Mode so it
Huh! News to me as well. I definitely agree with that decision. Thanks, Ori!
I've already written the Varnish code for setting X-MF-Mode so it can be
captured by varnishncsa. Is there agreement to switch to Mobile-Mode, or at
least, MF-Mode?
Looking especially to hear from Arthur and Matt.
--
Da
Thanks Ori, I was not aware of this
D
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-02-02, at 16:55, Ori Livneh wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Platonides wrote:
>
>> I don't like it's cryptic nature.
>>
>> Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very
>> confused ab
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Platonides wrote:
> I don't like it's cryptic nature.
>
> Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very
> confused about what's the point of «X-MF-Mode: b».
>
> Instead something like this would be much more descriptive:
> X-Mobile
I don't like it's cryptic nature.
Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very
confused about what's the point of «X-MF-Mode: b».
Instead something like this would be much more descriptive:
X-Mobile-Mode: stable
X-Mobile-Request: secondary
But that also means sending more byt
(Apologies for cross-posting)
Heya,
The mobile team needs accurate pageviews for the alpha and beta mobile
site. Currently, this information is only stored in a cookie, but we don't
want to go the route of starting to store this cookie because of cache
server performance, network performance and
