Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-31 Thread Sage Ross
The Strategic Planning wiki is a good place to discuss this idea and how it changed and/or implemented: http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals/Geonotice_improvements http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Proposals/Geonotice_improvements -Sage On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Sage Ross wr

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel Schwen
> seem to be just a way to geotag users. I don't see such feed. Perhaps > I'm missing something. Yeah, the discussion on VP about the whole endeavor. Not much resonance = no point in pursuing it. You need a large userbase (i.e. spatial coverage) for this to make sense.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel Schwen
>>> than having the users publish their location so they can be bugged about it. >> The idea was to have users "subscribe" to a feed (possibly posted by a >> bot onto a subpage in their user space). Articles are geocoded in any > Don't people sign up to work on stuff they feel like working on? I >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Platonides
Daniel Schwen wrote: >> than having the users publish their location so they can be bugged about it. > The idea was to have users "subscribe" to a feed (possibly posted by a > bot onto a subpage in their user space). Articles are geocoded in any > case so it makes perfect sense to have users post t

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Ryan Lane
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Schwen wrote: >> than having the users publish their location so they can be bugged about it. > The idea was to have users "subscribe" to a feed (possibly posted by a > bot onto a subpage in their user space). Articles are geocoded in any > case so it makes p

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel Schwen
> than having the users publish their location so they can be bugged about it. The idea was to have users "subscribe" to a feed (possibly posted by a bot onto a subpage in their user space). Articles are geocoded in any case so it makes perfect sense to have users post their location and have a bot

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Platonides
Daniel Schwen wrote: > That is a great idea, which incidentely resembles my idea to geocode > all commons users to facilitate photo requests. :-) > The response back then was... ...underwhelming (but I'm getting used > to that.. sob :-( ) > > [1] > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Geocod

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel Schwen
That is a great idea, which incidentely resembles my idea to geocode all commons users to facilitate photo requests. :-) The response back then was... ...underwhelming (but I'm getting used to that.. sob :-( ) [1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Geocode_Users?withJS=MediaWiki:Geocode_Us

[Wikitech-l] Geonotice improvements that could make Wikinews great (among other benefits)

2009-07-29 Thread Sage Ross
One of the great frustrations of Wikinews for me is that it doesn't have a system for identifying and pointing users toward opportunities to get out into the offline world and do original reporting. A fine-grained cross-project opt-in geonotice system could be a solution. Here's how I imagine it