I am liking the new UI features. However -- I notice that I seem to have
lost +2 rights to mediawiki/core. Are we rolling back the policy that all
foundation developers have +2?
~Matt Walker
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:49 PM,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Matthew Walker mwal...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I am liking the new UI features. However -- I notice that I seem to have
lost +2 rights to mediawiki/core. Are we rolling back the policy that all
foundation developers have +2?
No, this should not have changed...
Are you logged in? Everyone got logged out apparently, and this bit me at
first, too.
--
Matma Rex
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Yep. Logged in as mwal...@wikimedia.org. It's odd because I still have +2
on the fundraising repos. Maybe the ACL computation changed and I'm not in
some group that I should have been in?
~Matt Walker
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.comwrote:
Are you
Hi Chad,
On 12 February 2013 03:33, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Took a few minutes longer than expected, but we're back up and
everything's live. We had to deploy a newer version to grab one
last fix we spotted during the upgrade. Our deployed version is
now 2.5.1-1266-gcc231e1.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl wrote:
Hi Chad,
On 12 February 2013 03:33, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Took a few minutes longer than expected, but we're back up and
everything's live. We had to deploy a newer version to grab one
last fix we
Some other new features I've noticed that haven't been listed:
* Showing who has the ability to vote in each category (easily identify
project owners).
* Switch patchsets while in diff view.
* Changes show if they need to be rebased.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Rest assured--we will still be getting the latest and greatest. And we're
still
on target for late Monday/early Tuesday.
Friendly reminder that Gerrit will be coming down in about an hour
for the upgrade. During the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Rest assured--we will still be getting the latest and greatest. And we're
still
on target for late Monday/early Tuesday.
Friendly reminder that Gerrit
On Monday, February 11, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Chad wrote:
Took a few minutes longer than expected, but we're back up and
everything's live. We had to deploy a newer version to grab one
last fix we spotted during the upgrade. Our deployed version is
now 2.5.1-1266-gcc231e1.
There might be a
On 02/11/2013 09:33 PM, Chad wrote:
There might be a few problems left over with the IRC notifications,
I'll tackle those tomorrow (making sure replication is working properly
now). If you spot any other problems, please let me know.
I'm getting Internal Server Error intermittently in the add
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 02/11/2013 09:33 PM, Chad wrote:
There might be a few problems left over with the IRC notifications,
I'll tackle those tomorrow (making sure replication is working properly
now). If you spot any other
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After much delay, Gerrit 2.6 will be coming to our servers. This release
brings a *lot* of really cool features and fixes, but I'd like to outline a
couple of the major ones:
I realized a little bit ago that I was a
Hi,
After much delay, Gerrit 2.6 will be coming to our servers. This release
brings a *lot* of really cool features and fixes, but I'd like to outline a
couple of the major ones:
* A stable, documented RESTful api
* Plugin support:
** We'll be replacing Gitweb with Gitblit once the initial dust
On 02/04/2013 06:44 AM, Chad wrote:
** We'll be replacing Gitweb with Gitblit once the initial dust of the
upgrade settles
Does this mean new links will be in place? I've used links like
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
On 02/04/2013 06:44 AM, Chad wrote:
** We'll be replacing Gitweb with Gitblit once the initial dust of the
upgrade settles
Does this mean new links will be in place? I've used links like
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean new links will be in place? I've used links like
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki%2Fcore.git;a=commit;h=f04103185a071fc7ceb7f25daf1467791f2ae391
and it would be nice if those didn't break.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Sébastien Santoro
dereck...@espace-win.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean new links will be in place? I've used links like
If we can come up with some sane rewrite rules, I think we could
redirect gitweb urls to gitblit.
+1 -- like Mark I've used gitweb URLs in several places that I wouldn't
like to see breaking (one of them is original source of images moved to
commons from git).
~Walker
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After much delay, Gerrit 2.6 will be coming to our servers. This release
brings a *lot* of really cool features and fixes, but I'd like to outline a
couple of the major ones:
* A stable, documented RESTful api
*
20 matches
Mail list logo
